Skip to main content
Log in

A new and standardized approach for trocar placement in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Super-morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) present unique technical challenges. In our experience the ease of the operation and the operative time seem to be more dependent on body habitus than body mass index (BMI). We hypothesized that the distance between the xyphoid process and the umbilicus (the XU distance) correlated with surgical difficulty and described an original modification of trocar placement based on this measurement to improve the ease of the operation.

Methods

Seven hundred and seventy-four patients underwent LRYGB, and the XU distance was measured in a subset of 38 patients midway through the experience. The need for additional trocars was assessed intraoperatively and the relationship between the XU distance and the need for extra trocars was subsequently analyzed. A standardized approach for trocar placement was implemented in the second half of our series. The operative time was compared between the standardized and nonstandardized groups.

Results

Fifty percent of the patients required a five-trocar technique. Median XU distance in this group was 21.4 cm (range 17–25 cm). In the remaining 19 patients additional trocars were added; median XU distance was 27.3 cm (range 24–33 cm). From the 774 patients included in the study period, the operative time for the first 322 patients who were completed with a nonstandardized trocar approach was significantly longer than the subsequent 452 cases in which the standardized trocar approach was used (210 versus 173 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We define XU distance as the key element in determining the choice of trocar placement. When XU distance is less then 25 cm, the basic approach should be used and if it is greater than 25 cm, the advanced trocar approach is recommended. This standardized technique leads to decreased operative time and improved ease of operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shikora SA, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, Raskin E, Shore R (2005) Laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: results and learning curve of a high-volume academic program. Arch Surg 140:362–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17:212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG (2000) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 135:1029–1034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Higa KD, Ho T, Boone KB (2001) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technique and 3-year follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techn 11:377–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sekhar N, Torquati A, Youssef Y, Wright JK, Richards WO (2007) A comparison of 399 open and 568 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed during a 4-year period. Surg Endosc 21:665–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T (2000) Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients, what have we learned? Obes Surg 10:509–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campos GM, Ciovica R, Rogers SJ, Posselt AM, Vittinghoff E, Takata M, Cello JP (2007) Spectrum and risk factors of complications after gastric bypass. Arch Surg 142:969–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ (1994) Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 4:353–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng WCS, Kwok SPY, Leung KL, Chung CC, Lau WY, Li AKC (1996) Optimal position of working ports in laparoscopic surgery: an in vitro study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lublin M, Lyass S, Lahmann B, Cunneen SA, Khalili TM, Elashoff JD, Phillips EH (2005) Leveling the learning curve for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 19:845–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Namir Katkhouda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katkhouda, N., Moazzez, A., Popek, S. et al. A new and standardized approach for trocar placement in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 23, 659–662 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0075-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0075-x

Keywords

Navigation