Abstract
Background
To investigate the influence of the working surface height on task performance and muscle workload in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Methods
The standard task used was closure of 5-cm enterotomy inside a hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery trainer. Surgeons were instructed to place the sutures 3–5 mm apart and from the enterotomy edge. Ten surgeons participated in each experiment and one task was performed with each level. The first experiment compared the quality of task performance and muscle workload with the working surface at: elbow level, 10 cm above, 15 cm above and 10 cm below the elbow. Further narrower levels (5 cm below, at the elbow and 5 cm above the elbow) were investigated in the second experiment. Outcome measures were execution time (s), placement error score (mm), leakage pressure (mmHg), number of execution errors, muscle workload as measured by integrated electromyography (mV·s) and visual analogue score of back discomfort (mm).
Results
The first experiment showed that 15 cm above the elbow level was associated with the longest execution time and similar quality of task performance. This level resulted in a higher workload of the deltoid of the extracorporeal limb, the arm extensor of the intracorporeal side and the trapezius and paraspinal muscles of both intra- and extracorporeal limbs. Also, the 10 cm above the elbow level was associated with increased muscle workload of the deltoid of extracorporeal limb and the trapezius of both limbs compared with the elbow height. The 10 cm below the elbow level was associated with increased back discomfort. The second experiment showed that 5 cm below the elbow height was associated with increased muscle workload of the arm flexor group of the intracorporeal dominant limb.
Conclusions
The optimum table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery allows the working surface of the extracorporal instrument handle to be at or 5 cm above the elbow level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayoub MM (1973) Work place design and posture. Hum Factors 15:265–268
Berguer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:416–421
Manasnayakorn S, Cuschieri A, Hanna GB (2007) Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:924–929
Manasnayakorn S, Hanna GB, Khan F, Levison R, Cuschieri A (2004) The effect of the Omniport™ on the cutaneous microvascular activity of the hand. In: The 12th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other interventional Techniques (EAES)
Cuschieri A, Frank TG, Brown S, Martin D, Gove JL (2003) A new multitool for hand-assisted advanced laparoscopic surgery (HALS). Surg Endosc 17:1368–1371
Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29:409–414
Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139:1215–1220
Senders JW, Moray NP (1991) Human error: cause, prediction, and reduction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RH, Meijer DW (2002) Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:47–52
Ahmed S, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2004) Optimal angle between instrument shaft and handle for laparoscopic bowel suturing. Arch Surg 139:89–92
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all surgeons participated in the study. The author would also like to thank the Royal Thai Government for providing supports.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manasnayakorn, S., Cuschieri, A. & Hanna, G.B. Ergonomic assessment of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23, 783–789 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0068-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0068-9