Abstract
Introduction
The debate into whether or not to drain the common bile duct after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis continues. Reports are in favour of primary closure of choledochotomy in elective setting. The aim of this study is to evaluate our experience in the primary closure of choledochotomy in emergency setting by analysing indications, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and outcome.
Methods
All patients undergoing LCBDE were prospectively entered into a database incorporating demographic and clinical data including mode of admission, indication for surgery, operation details and clinical outcome. All operations were performed by the same consultant (A. Baker).
Results
All 81 patients had primary closure after LCBDE between October 2003 and April 2007. The male to female ratio was 1:3. Median age was 68 years (range 19–90 years). Nineteen (23%) patients had obstructive jaundice, 4 (5%) had cholangitis, 7 (8.6%) had acute pancreatitis, 9 (11.1%) had failed ERCP, and 42 (51.8%) had biliary colic or cholecystitis with positive intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Those patients were divided into two groups: elective LCBDE (ElLCBDE) (n = 33, 41%) and emergency LCBDE (EmLCBDE) (n = 48, 59%). There was no significant difference in the median operative time, median hospital stay and complication rate. Total laparoscopic clearance rate in this series was 95%.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first publication in the literature in which primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in emergency setting was used. With no significant difference in operative time, hospital stay and complications, in experienced hands primary closure of CBD in emergency settings is safe and feasible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckingham IJ (2001) ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas, and biliary system. Gallstone disease. BMJ 322(7278):91–94
Freitas ML, Bell RL, Duffy AJ (2006) Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol 12(20):3162–3167
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD005641
Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17(11):1705–1715
Thompson MH, Tranter SE (2002) All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89(12):1608–1612
Williams JA, Treacy PJ, Sidey P, Worthley CS, Townsend NC, Russell EA (1994) Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct. Aust NZ J Surg 64(12):823–826
Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8(10):1168–1174; discussion 1174–1175
Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13(10):952–957
Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1998) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12(1):16–22
Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT, Chau CH, Li MK (2004) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 51(60):1605–1608
Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP (1987) Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 294(6570):470–474
Wei Q, Hu HJ, Cai XY, Li LB, Wang GY (2004) Biliary drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy. World J Gastroenterol 10(21):3175–3178
Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C, Jorgensen JO (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72(3):177–180
Zhang LD, Bie P, Chen P, Wang SG, Ma KS, Dong JH (2004) [Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 42(9):520–523
Paganini AM, Lezoche E (1998) Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 12(1):23–29
Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Carlei F, Feliciotti F, Lomanto D, Guerrieri M (1996) Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a prospective study. World J Surg 20(5):535–541; discussion 542
Croce E, Golia M, Azzola M, Russo R, Crozzoli L, Olmi S (1996) Laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary closure. Follow-up (5–44 months) of 31 patients. Surg Endosc 10(11):1064–1068
Rhodes M, Nathanson L, O’Rourke N, Fielding G (1995) Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: lessons learned from 129 consecutive cases. Br J Surg 82(5):666–668
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alhamdani, A., Mahmud, S., Jameel, M. et al. Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 22, 2190–2195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0021-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0021-y