Skip to main content

Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study

Surgical Endoscopy volume 22, pages 2084–2087 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of closure of the appendeceal stump with only laparoscopic bipolar electrocautery in rats.

Methods

In this study, 40 female Wistar-Albino rats were used. In group I (n = 10), appendix vermiformis, approximately 1 cm in width, was completely ligated with 3/0 silk suture close to cecum, and removed. In group II (n = 20) and group III (n = 10), the appendeceal stump was coagulated by bipolar cautery. The coagulation of 70 mA took 10 s, and was repeated one more time. The stump was divided, and checked to ensure complete occlusion. Groups I and II underwent relaparotomy at 15 days, cecum was taken out, and the burst pressure of the stump was measured. Group III did not undergo relaparotomy; the burst pressure was measured during the first laparotomy.

Results

All rats survived. At relaparotomy, no intra-abdominal complications were detected, including intestinal obstruction, abscess, and leakage. Omentum and fatty tissue of uterus was adhered to the appendix stump in group I, but only fatty tissue of uterus was adhered on the stump in group II. Although the intracecal pressure reached 30 cmH2O, at which pressure the cecum was highly stretched, ligated (group I) or coagulated (group II) stumps did not burst or opened. In group III, the burst or opening pressure of the stump (11.2 ± 2.7 cmH2O) was significantly lower than in groups I and II (p < 0.001). Of group II rats, 80% had complete epithelial regeneration at the coagulated stump sites in contrast to ligated rats (p < 0.001) with severe inflammatory changes, abscess, and necrosis.

Conclusions

At late course, coagulated stumps did not allow the leakage or burst, unlike ligated stumps. However, coagulation of the stump seemed to contribute more to epithelial healing. This experimental model suggests that the closure of the stump with only bipolar coagulation was a safe and feasible method.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2001) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001439

  2. Anderson KD, Parry RL (1998) Appendicitis. In: O’Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG (eds). Pediatric Surgery, Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1369–1379

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Jacob CE, Ozaki A, Batagello C, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J (2005) Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1174–1180

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD 3rd, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:725–728

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Br J Surg 80:1599–1600

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: Prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342:633–637

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valioulis I, Hameury F, Dahmani L, Levard G (2001) Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in children: the two-trocar technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:391–394

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng WT, Lee YK, Hui SK, Sze YS, Chan J, Zeng AG, Wong CH, Wong WH (2004)An optimal, cost-effective laparoscopic appendectomy technique for our surgical residents. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:125–129

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5:176–178

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123:90–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khanna S, Khurana S, Vij S (2004) No clip, no ligature laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:201–203

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:710–712

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huwart L, El Khoury M, Lesavre A, Phan C, Rangheard AS, Bessoud B, Menu Y (2007) What is the thickness of the normal appendix on MDCT? J Radiol 88:385–389

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida H, Onda M, Tajiri T, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Koizumi M, Yoshimura K, Takasaki H, Furukawa K (2002) Ultrasonography of non-perforated appendicitis in young children. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1293–1295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Akdeniz University’s management unit of scientific research projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Akdeniz University School of Medicine Akdeniz Universitesi Tip Fakültesi, Cocuk Cerrahisi Anabilim Dali, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Adnan Aslan & Cagdas Karaveli

  2. Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine Akdeniz Universitesi Tip Fakültesi, Cocuk Cerrahisi Anabilim Dali, 07070, Antalya, Turkey

    Ozlem Elpek

Authors
  1. Adnan Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cagdas Karaveli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ozlem Elpek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Aslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aslan, A., Karaveli, C. & Elpek, O. Laparoscopic appendectomy without clip or ligature. An experimental study. Surg Endosc 22, 2084–2087 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9712-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9712-z

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Appendectomy
  • Bipolar coagulation