Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children

High-tech low-budget surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Two different laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) techniques, one performed with staplers (LAS) and the other using loops (LAL), were compared with transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (TULAA).

Methods

A total of 72 children, 55 with a diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis and 17 with recurrent right lower abdominal pain, underwent operation during the period 2003–2006. The procedures used were: 34 LAS, 9 LAL, and 29 TULAA. Measured outcomes were operative time, postoperative complications, need for rescue analgesics, length of hospital stay, and procedure cost reflected by supplies used. The staplers, endoloops, clips, and sutures used to manage appendectomy were listed at current prices, summarized as number consumed per case, and compared. Data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.

Results

Average price of materials used was 113.5 USD for LAS, 91USD for LAL, and 14 USD for TULAA. Wound infections were recorded in two patients (4.6%) in the LA group and in four patients (13.7%) in the TULAA group (p = 0.17). One patient in the LAL group developed an abdominal abscess that was managed conservatively. Median operating time was 39 (24-66) min in the LA group versus 33 (25-55) min in the TULAA group (p < 0.05). Rescue analgesia was administered in 19/43 (44%) of LA patients and 9/29 (31%) of TULAA patients (p = 0.19). The length of hospital stay was 3.1 days for LA patients and 3.0 days for TULAA patients (p = 0.43). Two TULAA procedures (6.4%) were finished with additional port/s.

Conclusions

In this study, the cost of TULAA is 7.8 times lower than the cost of LA, 8.1 times lower than LAS, and 6.5 times lower than LAL. Higher cost of laparoscopy is solely attributable to the purchase price of the supplies used. Overall postoperative morbidity, the incidence of wound infection, the length of hospitalization, and the need for rescue analgesia did not show a statistical difference in comparing LA/ TULAA. Operative time was shorter in the TULAA group. In terms of limited resources, TULAA could be the most appropriate minimally invasive technique for appendectomy in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler S, Scherrer M, Ruckauer KD, Daschner FD (2005) Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:268–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243:17–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Lobe T (1998) Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 7:225–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Alessio A, Piro E, Tadini B, Beretta F (2002) One-trocar transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: our experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:24–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DesCoteaux JG, Tye L, Poulin EC (1996) Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis. Can J Surg 39:133–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eddie G, White S (1996) A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs. Aust N Z J Surg 66:671–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Gohary MA, El-Marsafawy M (2001) Port-exteriorization appendectomy (PEA): a preliminary report. Pediatr Surg Int 17:39–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilchrist BF, Lobe TE, Schropp KP (1992) Is there a role for laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 27:209–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hay SA (1998) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 13:21–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video- assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:710–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K (2001) Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88:510–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McBurney C (1894) Incision made in the abdominal wall in the cases of appendicitis. Ann Surg 20:338–343

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer A, Preuss M, Roesler S, Lainka M, Omlor G (2004) Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted “one-trocar” appendectomy –TULAA, as an alternative operation method in the treatment of appendicitis. Zentralbl Chir 129:391–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicholson T, Tiruchelvam V (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. JSLS 5:47–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pappalepore N, Tursini S, Marino N, Lisi G, Lelli Chiesa P (2002) Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA): a safe and useful alternative for uncomplicated appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:383–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pelosi MA (1992) Laparoscopic appendectomy using single umbilical puncture (minilaparotomy). J Reprod Med 37:588–594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C (2002) One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 16:833–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:50–64

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suttie SA, Seth S, Driver CP, Mahomed AA (2004) Outcome after intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic appendectomy techniques. Surg Endosc 18:1123–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Valioulis I, Hameury F, Dahmani L, Levard G (2001) Laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy in children: the two-trocar technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Višnjić S, Popović L, Župančić B (2006) Laparoscopically assisted appendectomy. Eur Surg 38:374–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Zagreb, Klaiceva 16, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

    S. Visnjic

Authors
  1. S. Visnjic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Visnjic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visnjic, S. Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children. Surg Endosc 22, 1667–1671 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9680-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9680-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation