Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic transpapillary biliary stent placement is effective for closure of postoperative bile leaks. Large-bore stents (10 French) may transiently obstruct the adjacent pancreatic duct orifice causing acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy may reduce this risk, but it introduces separate risks of bleeding and perforation. The objective of this study was to compare complications after large-bore biliary stent placement (10 Fr) with and without sphincterotomy in patients with bile leaks.

Methods

The institutional endoscopy database was queried to identify patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrpahy (ERCP) for bile leak between March 1996 and August 2006. Procedural reports were reviewed for evidence of biliary sphincterotomy, cholangiographic and pancreatographic findings, transpapillary stent placement, and procedural complications. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy, choledochoenteric anastomosis, placement of multiple biliary stents and expandable metal biliary stents, biliary stents smaller than 10 Fr, and patients in whom a stent was not placed were excluded. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Probability ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The rate of pancreatitis (all mild) after large-bore biliary stent placement was greater when sphincterotomy was not performed than when sphincterotomy and stent placement were both performed (13% versus 2.4%). This difference was not statistically significant. (χ2 = 3.41; p = 0.1). Bleeding was observed in one patient who underwent sphincterotomy and large-bore stent placement (2.4%). No perforations occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Although not statistically significant, there is a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis after placement of large-bore biliary stents when sphincterotomy is not performed. The additional complications of biliary sphincterotomy did not offset the reduction in post-ERCP pancreatitis. When large-bore biliary stents are used in the treatment of bile leak, a biliary sphincterotomy may avoid pancreatitis. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether there is a significant difference in overall complication rate when large-bore stents are placed with and without biliary sphincterotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P, Schulze S, Stage JG, Wara P (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthel JS (1996) Letters to the editor. Internal stents and postsurgical bile leaks Am J Gastroenterol 91:1469–1470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjorkman DJ, Carr-Locke DL, Lichtenstein DR, Ferrari AP, Slivka A, Van Dam J, Brooks DC (1995) Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2128–2133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braghetto I, Bastias J, Csendes A, Debandi A (2000) Intraperitoneal bile collections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Surg Endosc 14:1037–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks DC, Becker JM, Connors PJ, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7:292–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RTA, Toouli J (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg 218:630–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman ML, Douglas BN, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanazaki K, Sodeyama H, Sode Y, Miyazawa M, Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi M, Kawamura N, Ohtsuka M, Miyzzaki T, Matsuda Y (1998) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1123–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadakia SC, Starnes E (1992) Comparison of 10 French gauge stent with 11.5 French gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 38:454–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, Byth K, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ (2005) Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 61:269–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecsytectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152:1040–1043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks JM, Ponsky JL, Shillingstad RB, Singh J (1998) Biliary stenting is more effective than sphincterotomy in the resolution of biliary leaks. Surg Endosc 12:327–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marvrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Papanikolaou IS, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, Romanos A (2006) Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting plus sphincterotomy for the treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy biliary leaks: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:405–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Navez B. Mutter D. Russier Y, Vix M, Jameli F, Lipski D, Cambier E, Guiot P, Lery J, Marescaux J (2001) Safety of laparoscopic approach for acute cholecystitis: retrospective study of 600 cases. World J Surg 25:1352–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:164–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Speer AG, Cotton PB, MacRae KD (1988) Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc 34:412–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Uflacker R, Vujic I, Cotton PB (1996) Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc 43:399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street, Charlton 8A, Rochester, 55934, Minnesota

    D. T. Simmons, B. T. Petersen, C. J. Gostout, M. J. Levy, M. D. Topazian & T. H. Baron

Authors
  1. D. T. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. T. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. J. Gostout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. D. Topazian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. H. Baron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. H. Baron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, D.T., Petersen, B.T., Gostout, C.J. et al. Risk of pancreatitis following endoscopically placed large-bore plastic biliary stents with and without biliary sphincterotomy for management of postoperative bile leaks. Surg Endosc 22, 1459–1463 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9643-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9643-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation