Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcome of the laparoscopic surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has become widely accepted recently. However, the oncological validity of this surgery has not yet been well analyzed, especially for advanced cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for stage II/III colorectal cancer in our hospital.

Patients and methods

Between June 1999 and August 2006, 321 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in our hospital; of those 121 cases whose pathological findings revealed stage II/III were included in this study. Among these cases, we assessed a short-term outcome and a medium-term outcome in terms of survival evaluation.

Results

The male:female ratio was 73:48, and mean age of patients was 62.4 years. Thirteen tumors were located in the cecum, 29 in the ascending colon, five in the transverse colon, one in the descending colon, 43 in the sigmoid colon, and 30 in the rectum. Average duration of operation was 184 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 53.5 ml. Five patients (4.1%) were converted to open procedures. No intraoperative complication was observed but eight complications (6.6%) occurred postoperatively. Forty-two cases were classified as stage II, 62 as stage IIIA /B, and 17 as stage IIIC. Five patients died of cancer relapse (4.1%), and 18 cases had recurrence of disease (14.9%), to date. No port-site recurrence was detected. Overall five-year survival was 95.7% in stage II, 84.1% in stage IIIA/B, 70.0% in stage IIIC. Meanwhile disease-free five-year survival was 75.6% in stage II, 80.1% in stage IIIA/B, and 66.8% in stage IIIC. No significant difference was observed between stages, in terms of either overall or disease-free survival.

Conclusion

Although further evaluation is required, laparoscopic surgery for stage II/III colorectal cancer is safe and would be an oncologically adequate procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:46–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:636–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82:295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquet P, Averbach AM, Jacquet N (1995) Abdominal wall metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:568–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lechaux D, Trebuchet G, Le Calve JL (2002) Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancer. Surg Endosc 16:1409–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sample CB, Watson M, Okrainec A, Gupta R, Birch D, Anvari M (2006) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:30–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM (2006) Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surg Endosc 20:546–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Jeng YM (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14:109–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AJCC (2002) AJCC cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1997) Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma. 1st ed. Kanehara, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Naitoh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naitoh, T., Tsuchiya, T., Honda, H. et al. Clinical outcome of the laparoscopic surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22, 950–954 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9528-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9528-x

Keywords

Navigation