Abstract
Introduction
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an evolving field and suitable instruments are lacking. The purpose of this study was to perform transvaginal cholecystectomies using instruments incorporated into a magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS).
Methods
Non-survival procedures were conducted in pigs (n = 4). Through a vaginotomy created under direct vision, a rigid access port was inserted into the peritoneal cavity and used to maintain a CO2 pneumoperitoneum. MAGS instruments were deployed through the port and held in place on the peritoneal surface using magnetic coupling via an external handheld magnet which was optionally exchanged for an 18ga percutaneous threaded needle anchor; instruments included a tissue retractor (a clip-fixated magnet or flexible graspers) and a cautery dissector. A gastroscope was used for visualization.
Results
The first two procedures ended prematurely due to instrumentation shortcomings and inadvertent magnetic coupling between instruments; one case required a laparoscopic rescue. Three new forms of instrumentation were developed: (1) a longer access port (50 cm) which provided easier deployment of instruments and suitable reach, (2) a more robust cauterizer with a longer, more rigid, pneumatically deployed tip with better reach and sufficient torque to allow blunt dissection, and (3) a more versatile tissue retractor with bidirectional dual flexible graspers which provided excellent cephalad fundus retraction and inferiolateral infundibulum retraction. With these modifications, 100% of the cholecystectomy was completed in the third and fourth animals using only a NOTES/MAGS approach. Retrieval of the tissue retractor resulted in a rectal injury in the third animal but further procedural modifications resulted in a successful procedure in the fourth animal with no complications.
Conclusions
While still under development with more refinements needed, completely transvaginal cholecystectomy using MAGS instruments is feasible. By offering triangulation and rigidity, MAGS may facilitate a NOTES approach while alleviating shortcomings of a flexible platform.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Napper CA, Cadeddu JA (2002) Transvaginal laparoscopic nephrectomy: development and feasibility in the porcine model. Urology 59:446–450
Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117
Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61:601–606
Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Scorpio DG, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Kalloo AN (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453
Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Vaughn CA, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Barlow D, Shimonaka H, Kalloo AN (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–92
Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, Vaughn CA, Beitler DM, Chung SCC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RJ, Pasricha PJ, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Talamini MA, Kalloo AN (2006) Per-oral transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: Is it possible? Surg Endosc 20:522–525
Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills T, Tajiri H, Swain CP (2005) Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:122–129
Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478
Swanstrom LL, Kozarek R, Pasricha PJ, Gross S, Birkett D, Park PD, Saadat V, Ewers R, Swain P (2005) Development of a new access device for transgastric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1129–1137
Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D, Yazaki E, Park PO, Mills T, Swain P (2004) Transgastric gastropexy and hiatal hernia repair for GERD under EUS control: a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 59:89–95
Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312
Pai RD, MD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434
Lima E, Rolanda C, Pego JM, Henriques-Coelho T, Silva D, Carvalho JL, Correia-Pinto J (2006) Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: a novel 5 mm port for intra-abdominal scarless surgery. J Urology 176:802–805
Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) SAGES/ASGE Working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333
Malik A, Mellinger JD, Hazey JW, Dunkin BJ, MacFadyen BV Jr (2006) Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities. Surg Endosc 20:1179–1192
McGee MF, Rosen MD, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 13:86–93
Kaehler G, Grobholz R, Langner C, Suchan K, Post S (2006) A new technique of endoscopic full-thickness resection using a flexible stapler. Endoscopy 38:86–89
Cadeddu JA, Eberhart R, Fernandez R, Bergs R (2005) Transabdominal magnetic anchoring system for trocar-less laparoscopic surgery. J Urology 167:4 (abstract)
Park S, Bergs R, Eberhart R, Baker L, Fernandez R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Trocar-less laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 245:379–384
Zeltser IS, Bergs R, Fernandez R, Baker L, Eberhart R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urology 178:288–291
Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Bergs R, Fernandez R (2006) Magnetically-Anchored Instruments for Transgastric Endoscopic Surgery, Presented at the SAGES Emerging Technologies Session, SAGES Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX April 29, 2006
Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Cadeddu JA (2007) Transgastric, transcolonic, and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21(Suppl):S474
Clayton RD (2006) Hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:73–87
Kovac SR (2000) Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 95:787–793
Khouri A, Magos A (2005) The cost of out-patient culdoscopy compared to in-patient laparoscopy in women with infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol 25:160–165
Paulson JD, Ross JW, El-Sahwi S, Paulson JD, Ross JW, El-Sahwi S (1999) Development of flexible culdoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6:487–490
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the equipment support provided by Olympus, Karl Storz Endoscopy, the US Surgical Corporation, and Valleylab.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, D.J., Tang, Sj., Fernandez, R. et al. Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21, 2308–2316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9498-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9498-z