Skip to main content
Log in

The man—machine interface, a paradox of technology. Is the black box (BB) concept an angel or a demon?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, van der Elst M, Karsten TM, Dankelman J (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study. Surg Endosc 21(2):275–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yavuz Y, Skogas JG, Gulluoglu MG, Lango T, Marvik R (2006) Are cold light sources really cold? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):370–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook RI (2003) Seeing is believing. Ann Surg 237(4):472–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson GM (2006) Laparoscopic biliary tract injury: what are the limits of prevention? Surg Endosc 20:1635–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal BB, Gupta M, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC (2007) Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source - a modified technique. Surg Endosc SEND-06-0784.R1 (ahead of publication)

  6. Witkowski P, Ermanno E, Trabucco (2007) Is there an increased risk of the vas deferens occlusion after mesh inguinal hernioplasty and what can we do about it? Ann Surg 245:154–155

  7. Kaafarani HMA, Itani KMF (2005) The surgeon’s ego and reporting of clinical failure. Br J Surg 92:122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin RCG, Murray MD, Brennan F, Jaques DP (2002) Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature Ann Surg 235(6):803–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swanstrom LL (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repairs. Surg Clin N Am 80(4) 1341–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuschieri A (2006) Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 244(5) 642–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eypasch E, Lefering R, Kum CK, Troidl H (1995) Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder. BMJ 311:619–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Russell T (2006) Safety and quality improvement in surgical practice. Ann Surg 244(5):653–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lill MM, Wilkinson TJ (2005) Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey of patients’ preferences for doctors’ appearance and mode of address. BMJ 331:1524–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klass D (2007) Assessing doctors at work — Progress and challenges. N Engl J Med 356(4):414–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hockerstedt K (2006) Surgeons’ self-esteem: A change from too high to too low? Ann Surg 244(6):841–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brij B. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, B.B., Agarwal, S. The man—machine interface, a paradox of technology. Is the black box (BB) concept an angel or a demon?. Surg Endosc 21, 1680 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9439-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9439-x

Keywords

Navigation