Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique

Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The management of parastomal hernia is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates (20–70%). This study investigated a novel laparoscopic approach and evaluated its outcomes.

Methods

A consecutive multi-institutional series of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair between 2001 and 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Laparoscopy was used with modification of the open Sugarbaker technique. A nonslit expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh was placed to provide 5-cm overlay coverage of the stoma and defect. Transfascial sutures secured the mesh, allowing the stoma to exit from the lateral edge. Five advanced laparoscopic surgeons performed all the procedures. The primary outcome measure was hernia recurrence.

Results

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 60 years and a body mass index of 29 kg/m2 underwent surgery. Six of these patients had undergone previous mesh stoma revisions. The mean size of the hernia defect was 64 cm2, and the mean size of the mesh was 365 cm2. There were no conversions to open surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity was 23%, and the mean hospital length of stay was 3.3 days. One patient died of pulmonary complications; one patient had a trocar-site infection; and one patient had a mesh infection requiring mesh removal. During a median follow-up period of 19 months (range, 2–38 months), 4% (1/25) of the patients experienced recurrence.

Conclusion

On the basis of this large case series, the laparoscopic nonslit mesh technique for the repair of parastomal hernias seems to be a promising approach for the reduction of hernia recurrence in experienced hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

References

  1. Carne P, Robertson G, Frizelle F (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leong A, Londono-Schimmer E, Phillips R (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Londono-Schimmer E, Leong A, Phillips R (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickel A, Shinkarevsky E, Eitan A (1999) Laparoscopic repair of paracolostomy hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 9:353–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deol Z, Shayani V (2003) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Arch Surg 138:203–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunet F, Pfister C, Denis R, Pascal T, Khalil H, Peillon C (2002) Laparoscopic management of parastomal herniation in transileal urinary diversion. J Urol 167:236–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould J, Ellison E (2003) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson B, Nieuwenhoven Ev, Bleichrodt R (2003) Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1789–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LeBlanc K, Bellanger D (2002) Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results. J Am Coll Surg 194:232–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pekmezci S, Memisoglu K, Karahasanoglu T, Alemdaroglu K (2002) Laparoscopic giant parastomal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh. Tech Coloproctol 6:187–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Porcheron J, Payan B, Balique J (1998) Mesh repair of paracolostomy hernia by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 12:1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Votik A (2000) Simple technique for laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1451–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozlowski P, Wang P, Winfield HN (2001) Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery. J Endourol 15:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugarbaker P (1985) Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 201:344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramshaw B, Esartia P, Schwab J, Manson E, Wilson R, Duncan T, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorraphy. Am Surg 65:827–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heniford B, Park A, Ramshaw B, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kossovsky N, Freiman C, Howarth D (2001) Biomaterials pathology. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York pp 221–234

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aldridge A, Simson J (2001) Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia. Hernia 5:110–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris-Stiff G, Hughes L (1998) The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:184–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Voeller G (2001) Repair of incisional hernias and midline defects. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York 516–526

    Google Scholar 

  21. Law N, Ellis H (1988) Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mater 3:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahin M, Hasandglu A, Erbilen M (1995) Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study). Acta Chir Hung 96:291–295

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy J, Freeman J, Dionne P (1989) Comparison of Marlex and Gore-Tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Can J Surg 32:244–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Law N (2001) Expanded polytetrafluorethylene. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York 279–285

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bujan J, Contreras L, Martin AC-S, Bellon J (1997) The behaviour of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring of abdominal wall defects. Histol Histopathol 12:683–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Ramshaw.

Additional information

Presented at the Plenary Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2006 Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, April 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mancini, G.J., McClusky, D.A., Khaitan, L. et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 21, 1487–1491 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9419-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9419-1

Keywords

Navigation