Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic primary choledochorrhaphy over endonasobiliary drainage tubes

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The T-tube is widely used in laparoscopic choledochotomy to decompress the biliary tree. However, there are high morbidity rates related to the T-tube. This study reviewed the results of laparoscopic primary choledochorrhaphy over endonasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tubes to find an effective alternative to the T-tube for the performance of laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Methods

From March 2003 to September 2005, 23 patients (9 men and 14 women) with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy over ENBD tubes. The mean age of these patients was 47 years (range, 32–73 years). At admission, six patients had cholangitis. All the patients had ENBD tubes placed preoperatively after the failure of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Results

There was no conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 90 min (range, 70–150 min). There were no biliary complications such as bile leaks, biliary peritonitis, or pancreatitis. No residual stones were found by postoperative cholangiograms. The ENBD tubes were removed between postoperative days 7 and 9. The hospital stay ranged from 8 to 14 days, with 16 patients (70%) discharged on postoperative day 8. The complications were limited to one umbilical infection and one case of pneumonia. The median follow-up period was 24 months (range, 8–36 months), and none of the patients were readmitted with biliary symptoms.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic choledochotomy over ENBD tubes proved to be technically feasible and safe. The ENBD tube decompresses the biliary tree and allows for cholangiography after surgery. Its removal does not need to wait for tract maturation, which allows an earlier removal of the tube and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Laparoscopic choledochotomy over ENBD tubes is an effective alternative to the T-tube in laparoscopic choledochotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228: 29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17: 12–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gersin KS, Fanelli RD (1998) Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting as an adjunct to common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 12: 301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Depaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M, Machado C, Ferrari A, Machado MM (1998) Results of the routine use of a modified endoprosthesis to drain the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 12: 933–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujimura M, Hirano M, Sato I, Kinoshita T, Yamamoto I, Nishimura K, Takahara H, Yamamoto A (2000) The C tube in biliary surgery: its development and clinical application. Nippon Geka Hokan 68: 85–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12: 16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson MH, Tranter SE (2002) All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89: 1608–1612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vecchio R, MacFadyen BV (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387: 45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: a multi-institutional SAGES study. Surg Endosc 8: 1168–1175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons Ductal Stone Cooperative Group (1996) EAES ductal stone study: preliminary findings of multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10: 1130–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12: 16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, De Seguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44: 28–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosimann F, Schneider R, Mir A, Gillet M (1994) Erosion of the duodenum by a biliary T-tube: an unusual complication of liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 26: 3550–3551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ortega Lopez D, Ortiz Oshiro E, La Pena Gutierrez L, Martinez Sarmiento J, Sobrino del Riego JA, Alvarez Fernandez-Represa J (1995) Scintigraphic detection of biliary fistula after removal of a T-tube. Br J Surg 82: 82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Corbett CR, Fyfe NC, Nicholls RJ, Jackson RT (1986) Bile peritonitis after removal of T-tubes from the common bile duct. Br J Surg 73: 641–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gharaibeh KIA, Heiss HA (2000) Biliary leakage following T-tube removal. Int Surg 85: 57–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Croce E, Golia M, Azzola M, Russo R, Crozzoli L, Olmi S, Pompa C, Borzio M (1996) Laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary closure: follow-up (5–44 months) of 31 patients. Surg Endosc 10: 1064–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu JS, Soper NJ (2002) Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques. Surg Endosc 16: 1309–1313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M, Machado C, Ferrari A, Machado MM (1998) Results of the routine use of a modified endoprosthesis to drain the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc12: 933–935

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu L, Zhang Z, Chen K, Wu R, Mao G, Luo J, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zeng T (2002) Primary common bile duct closure after choledochotomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 40: 927–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang LD, Bie P, Chen P, Wang SG, Ma KS, Donf JH (2004) Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 42: 520–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.-Y. Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, HF., Hu, SY., Zhang, GY. et al. Laparoscopic primary choledochorrhaphy over endonasobiliary drainage tubes. Surg Endosc 21, 2115–2117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9299-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9299-4

Keywords

Navigation