Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1701–1708 | Cite as

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy

  • A. L. Rawlings
  • J. H. Woodland
  • R. K. Vegunta
  • D. L. Crawford
Article

Abstract

Background

This study compared the experience and cost of the DaVinci Robotic system and laparoscopy for colon resections.

Methods

For this study, 30 consecutive robotic and 27 consecutive laparoscopic colectomies were divided into right and sigmoid colectomies for analysis. Comparisons included indications for surgery, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, operating room (OR) cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, OR time cost, and total hospital cost.

Results

The comparison groups were similar in indications for surgery, gender, age, BMI, EBL, and LOS. The right colectomies included 17 robotic and 15 laparoscopic procedures. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the robotic cases, and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the laparoscopic cases. The total case time was 218.9 min for the robotic and 169.2 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.002). The total hospital cost was $9,255 for the robotic and $8,073 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.430). The total OR cost was $5,823 for the robotic and $4,339 for the laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.000). The sigmoid colectomies included 13 robotic and 12 laparoscopic procedures. The robotic and laparoscopic cases were managed in similar sequence. The total case time was 225.2 min for the robotic and 199.4 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.128). The total hospital cost was $12,335 for the robotic and $10,697 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.735). The total OR cost was $6,059 for the robotic and $4,974 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.068). The complications in the robotic groups were more numerous, but were not attributable to equipment.

Conclusions

The comparison groups were similar. The robotic cases were significantly longer for right colectomies because of the intracorporeal anastomosis instead of the extracorporeal anastomosis performed in the laparoscopy cases. Every cost category was higher for the robotic cases. The right colectomies showed significant increases in total OR cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, and OR time cost. The sigmoid colectomies had significant increases in OR personnel cost and OR supply cost. The total hospital cost was higher for the robotic groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Keywords

Cost DaVinci Right colectomy Robotic colectomy Sigmoid colectomy Telerobotics 

References

  1. 1.
    Anvari M, Birch D, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 311–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballantyne G, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83: 1293–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braumann C, Jacobi C, Menenakos C, Borchert U, Rueckert J, Mueller J (2005) Computer–assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the DaVinci system: our first experiences. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1820–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cadiere G, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camarillo D, Krummel T, Salisbury J (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188: 2S–15SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2162–2168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delaney C, Lynch A, Senagore A, Fazio V (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1633–1639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanly E, Talamini M (2004) Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188: 19S–26SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hazey J, Melvin W (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Lap Surg 11: 107–112Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11: 415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melvin W, Needleman J, Krause K, Schneider C, Wolf R, Michler R, Ellison E (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery: initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1790–1792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perez A, Zinner M, Ashley S, Brooks D, Whang E (2003) What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc 17: 811–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rawlings A, Woodland J, Crawford D (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20: 1713–1718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C (2002) Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparendosc Adv Surg Tech 12: 225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin W (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17: 1521–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1689–1696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Rawlings
    • 1
  • J. H. Woodland
    • 1
  • R. K. Vegunta
    • 1
  • D. L. Crawford
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at PeoriaPeoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations