Abstract
Background
This study aimed to develop a regression-based prediction equation for operation time for laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) using ultrasound measurement.
Methods
Patients who were to undergo laparoscopic myomectomy from March 2003 to December 2005 were enrolled prospectively in a tertiary institution. Ultrasound was performed before operation. The myoma weights were calculated and converted into mass units (g) by an assumed smooth muscle density of 1.04 g/cm3. Myomas were weighed immediately after operation, and the correlation between these two weights was assessed by linear regression and limits of agreement. A multivariate linear regression model was fitted to the ultrasound parameters and clinical variables to predict operation time.
Results
Of 109 patients, 203 myomas were removed laparoscopically with a mean ultrasound-measured myoma weight of 137.9 (100.7) g, a diameter of the dominant myoma of 6.30 (1.92) cm, and an operation time of 125 (41) min. Strong correlations were observed between the ultrasound-measured and operated myoma weights. A predictive model, in which operation time = 0.14 × ultrasound-measured myoma weight + 1.68 × BMI + 5.21 × operated myoma number + 0.06 × (ultrasound-measured myoma weight × operated myoma number) + 43.97, was developed.
Conclusions
Operation time was significantly related to the myoma weight measured by ultrasound. The ultrasound-derived prediction equation is valid and reliable in predicting operation time for LM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bland JM, Altman DG (2003) Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22: 85–93
Cantuaria GH, Angioli R, Frost L, Duncan R, Penalver MA (1998) Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 92: 109–112
Chang WC, Torng PL, Huang SC, Sheu BC, Hsu WC, Chen RJ,Chow SN, Chang DY (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12: 336–342
Dubuisson JB, Lecuru F, Foulot H, Mandelbrot L, Aubriot FX, Mouly M (1991) Myomectomy by laparoscopy: a preliminary report of 43 cases. Fertil Steril 56: 827–830
Dubuisson JB, Chavet X, Chapron C, Gregorakis SS, Morice P (1995) Uterine rupture during pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod 10: 1475–1477
Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Levy L (1996) Difficulties and complications of laparoscopic myomectomy. J Gynecol Surg 12: 159–165
Dubuisso JB, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K, Chapron C (2000) Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update 6: 588–594
Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Fourchotte V, Babaki-Fard K, Coste J, Chapron C (2001) Laparoscopic myomectomy: predicting the risk of conversion to an open procedure. Hum Reprod 16: 1726–1731
Farquhar C, Brown PM, Furness S (2002) Cost effectiveness of pre-operative gonadotrophin releasing analogues for women with uterine fibroids undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy. BJOG 109: 1273–1280
Friedman AT, Haas ST (1993) Should uterine size be an indication for surgical intervention in women with myomas? Am J Obstet Gynecol 168: 751–755
Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V, Diamond J, Darai E, Seinera P, Seracchioli R (2004) Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 18–21
Harb TS, Adam RA (2005) Predicting uterine weight before hysterectomy: ultrasound measurement versus clinical assessment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193: 2122–2125
Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Sistos F, Dmowski WP (1992) Laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 80: 884–888
Kung FT, Chang SY (1996) The relationship between ultrasonic volume and actual weight of pathologic uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest 42: 35–38
Landi S, Zaccoletti R, Ferrari L, Minelli L (2001) Laparoscopic myomectomy: technique, complications, and ultrasound scan evaluations. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8: 231–240
Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB (1996) Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 654–658
Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B (2004) A retrospective multicentre study comparing myomectomy by laparoscopy and laparotomy in current surgical practice. What are the best patient selection criteria? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 117: 82–86
Marret H, Chevillot M, Giraudeau B, Study Group of the French Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Ouest Division) (2006) Factors influencing laparoconversions during the learning curve of laparoscopic myomectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85: 324–329
Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Perez-Jaffe LA, Tureck RW (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 9: 1179–1197
Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Silfen SL, Schaffer N, Evans D (1991) Laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Fertil 36: 275–280
Papp Z, Sztanyik L, Szabo I, Inovay J (1996) Successful pregnancy after bilateral internal iliac artery ligation monitored by color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7: 211–212
Parker WH, Rodi IA (1994) Patient selection for laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2: 23–26
Platt JF, Bree RL, Davidson D (1990) Ultrasound of the normal nongravid uterus: correlation with gross and histopathology. J Clin Ultrasound 18: 15–19
Seinera P, Arisio R, Decko A, Farina C, Crana F (1997) Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, surgical technique and complications. Hum Reprod 12: 1927–1930
Semm K, Mettler L (1980) Technical progress in pelvic surgery via operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138: 121–127
Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K (2006) The effect of vasopressin on local and general circulation during laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13: 190–194
Sinha R, Hegde A, Warty N, Patil N (2003) Laparoscopic excision of very large myomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10: 461–468
Sinha RY, Hegde A, Warty N, Jain R (2004) Laparoscopic devascularization of uterine myomata followed by enucleation of the myomas by direct morcellation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11: 99–102
Stewart EA (2001) Uterine fibroids. Lancet 357: 293–298
Torng PL, Chang WC, Hwang JS, Hsu WC, Wang JD, Huang SC, Chen CF, Su TC (2007) Quality of life after laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: is uterine weight a major factor? Qual Life Res 16:227–237
Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K, Coulter A, Yeates D (1992) The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99: 402–407
Wagaarachchi PT, Fernando L (2000) Fertility following ligation of internal iliac arteries for life-threatening obstetric haemorrhage: case report. Hum Reprod 15: 1311–1313
Zullo F, Pellicano M, De Stefano R, Zupi E, Mastrantonio P (1998) A prospective randomized study to evaluate leuprolide acetate treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy: efficacy and ultrasonographic predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178: 108–112
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant NTUH095-000400 from National Taiwan University Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, WC., Hwang, JS., Chang, WC. et al. Prediction of operation time for laparoscopic myomectomy by ultrasound measurements. Surg Endosc 21, 1600–1606 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9189-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9189-1