Skip to main content
Log in

A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate a two-center experience with pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, specifically focusing on the outcome parameters of operative time, complication, analgesic requirement, and postoperative stay.

Methods

This ambispective study was conducted over a 4-year period between May 2001 and May 2005 in two tertiary pediatric surgical centers. Data were prospectively recorded from an in-house expanded medical audit system (EMAS) and a Microsoft Excel database. Information on patient demographics, operative time, complications, analgesic requirement, and length of hospital stay were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

A total of 30 consecutive patients with a mean age of 4.43 years (range, 3 months to 15 years) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. All the patients underwent unilateral nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy for multidysplastic kidney (n = 12), reflux nephropathy (n = 13), pelvicoureteric junction obstruction (n = 4), or cystic disease of indeterminate cause (n = 1). The mean operative time was 93 ± 30 min. The principal hemostatic devices used were the Harmonic Scalpel (20 cases), liga clips (5 cases), and hook diathermy and endoshears exclusively (4 cases). There were no conversions, but the intraoperative complications of bleeding (n = 2), difficult location (n = 1), difficult extraction (n = 1), and requirement for a liver retractor (n = 2) were encountered. An additional five patients had problems in the immediate postoperative period, two of whom went on to have long term difficulties with recurrent urinary tract infections resulting from a residual ureteric stump, which required surgery. Nearly one-third of the patients required morphine for analgesia in the immediate postoperative period, with the figure falling to 20% by day 1. The median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (range, 0–16 days). At this writing, all the patients remain under surveillance with a mean follow-up period of 2.88 years, and no patients have experienced complications secondary to intraabdominal adhesions.

Conclusion

Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is technically feasible in most cases of benign renal disease. The intraoperative complications are minimal, and recovery for most is robust. Two-thirds of the patients are discharged within 24 h. In this study, narcotic analgesics were prescribed in about a one-third of all the cases for a limited period. Further problems may be seen when refluxing ureters are incompletely excised. However, the transperitoneal approach does not mitigate against complete excision because the exposure to the pelvis is adequate. At the midterm follow-up assessment, adhesive obstruction was not encountered, confirming this approach as a tenable alternative to other laparoscopic approaches for nephrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR (2004) Taking the side of transperitoneal access for surgery in upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borzi PA (2001) A comparison of the lateral and posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for complete and partial nephroureterectomy in children. BJU Int 87: 517–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borzi PA, Yeung CK (2004) Selective approach for transperitoneal and extraperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy in children. J Urol 171: 814–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayman RV, Mc Dougall EM, Kerbl K, Anderson K, Kavoussi LR (1994) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal (abstract 459). J Urol 151: 342A

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM, Kaouk JH, Gill 1S (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173: 38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. El Goneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H Grainy AL (1998) Renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol 160: 1138–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gill IS, Clayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y, Chiu AW, Das S, Donovan JF, Fuchs GJ, Gaur DD, Go H, Gomella LG, Grune MT, Harewood LM, Janetschek G, Knapp PM, McDougall EM, Nakada SY, Preminger GM, Puppo P, Rassweiler JJ, Royce PL, Thomas R, Urban DA, Winfield HN (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52: 566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hemal AK, Wadhwa SN, Kumar M, Gupta NP (1999) Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. J Urol 162: 35–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoznek A, Salomon L, Gettman M, Stolzenburg J, Abbou C (2004) Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor R, Singh KJ, Suri A, Dubey D, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kumar A (2006) Hem-o-lok clips for vascular control during laparoscopic ablative nephrectomy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20: 202–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar M, Kumar R, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2001) Complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgery at one centre. BJU Int 87: 607–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin SF, Gill SI (2002) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Curr Urol Rep 3: 164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 10: 45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Goldfarb DA, Gill IS (2004) Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 63: 857–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP,Steinberg AP, Spaliviero M, Abreu SC, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2005) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 174: 846–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Matsuura O, Oshima S (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy via the retroperitoneoscopic approach. J Urol 156: 1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, Clayman RV, Janetschek G, McDougall EM, Docimo SG, Parra RO, Kavoussi LR (2002) Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology 59: 37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P (1998) Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 33: 489–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their colleagues for making some of their patients available for the purposes of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Mahomed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahomed, A.A., Hoare, C., Welsh, F. et al. A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children. Surg Endosc 21, 1532–1536 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9162-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9162-z

Keywords

Navigation