Skip to main content
Log in

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although the clinical benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery have been shown in several procedures including colorectal resection, splenectomy and gastrectomy, efficacy and invasiveness in pancreatic surgery have not been well investigated. We assessed the clinical benefits and invasiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALS-DP) in relation to the occurrence of post-operative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

Methods

Subjects comprised 8 patients underwent HALS-DP (with splenectomy, n= 7; without splenectomy, n= 1) for benign or low malignant pancreatic lesions between March 2004 and December 2005. Indications for HALS-DP consisted of mucinous cystadenoma (n= 4), endocrine tumors (n= 2), serous cystadenoma (n= 1) and pancreatic pseudocyst (n= 1). Controls comprised 9 patients who underwent conventional open distal pancreatectomy (Open-DP) for benign or low malignant lesions of the pancreas in the same period.

Results

No significant differences were identified between HALS-DP and Open-DP in operation time. However, intra-operative blood loss, CRP on post-operative day (POD) 1 [5.5 mg/dl (1.8–8.1) vs. 9.7 mg/dl (5.9–12.1); p = .006] and POD 3 [8.5 mg/dl (1.7–11.1) vs. 17.7 mg/dl (10.7–21.5); p = .003], occurrence of post-operative SIRS (13% vs. 67%; p < .05, one-sided), duration of SIRS [0 day (0–1) vs. 1 day (0–4); p = .02] and post-operative hospital stay were significantly lower in HALS-DP than in Open-DP. Furthermore, no pancreatic fistula was seen with HALS-DP, as compared to 2 (22%) with Open-DP.

Conclusion

HALS-DP is safer and less invasive than Open-DP for benign or low malignant pancreatic tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American College of Chest Phisicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20: 864–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Doi R, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Komoto I, Ohta Y, Torii M, Imamura M (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic resection of serous cystadenoma of the pancreas. Surg Endosc 17: 2028-2031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Perissat J, Mahajna A (2005) Completely laparoscopic total and partial gastrectomy for benign and malignant diseases: a single institute’s prospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg 200: 191-197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs KH, Feussner H, Bonavina L, Collard JM, Coosemans W, for the European Study Group for Antireflux Surgery (ESGARS) (1997) Current status and trends in laparoscopic antireflux surgery: results of a consensus meeting. Endoscopy 29: 298–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haga Y, Beppu T, Doi K, Nozawa F, Mugita N, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1997) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction following gastrointestinal surgery. Crit Care Med 25: 1994–2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S. Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 7: 636–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinder RA, Libbey JS, Gorecki P, Bammer T (1999) Antireflux surgery: indications, preoperative evaluation, and outcome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 28: 987–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang JG, Chung MH, Chao PG, Yeh CC, Hsiao CW, Lee TY, Jao SW (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open cholectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18: 577–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kishimoto T, Hosokawa Y, Torimoto K, Ono T, Joko M, Momose H (2002) Assessment of surgical invasiveness of augmentation ileocystoplasty applying the systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in patients with spina bifida. Jpn J Urol 236: 681–685

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kusminsky RE, Boland JP, Tiley EH, Deluca JA (1995) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995: 463–467

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mijier DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14: 891–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mutoh M, Takeyama K, Nishiyama N, Kunishima Y, Matsukawa M, Tkahashi S, Hotta H, Itoh N, Tsukamoto T (2004) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 64: 422–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Bergner A, Gallagher KA, Perugini RA, Litwin DF (2006) Immunologic effects of hand-assisted surgery on peritoneal macrophages: comparison to open and standard laparoscopic approaches. Surgery 139: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Reilly MJ, Saye WB, Mullins SG, et al. (1995) Technique of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Surg 5: 463–467

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213: 3–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rangel-Grausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T Davis CD, Wenzel RP (1995) The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). JAMA 273: 117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM, Ponsky J (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy vs conventional laparoscopic splenectomy in case of splenomegaly. Arch Surg 137: 1348–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Southern Surgeon’s Club Study Group (1999) Handoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter trial of a minimally invasive technique for complex abdominal surgery. Arch Surg 134: 477–485; discussion 485–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang CN, Li MK (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Surg Endosc 17: 324-327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, Martinez-Bru C, Cortes M, Boluda R, Lerma L, Trias M (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc 16: 234-239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Targarona EM, Espert JJ, Bombuy E, Vidal O, Cerdan G, Artigas V, Trias M (2000) Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy. Arch Surg 135: 1137-1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Underwood RA, Soper NJ (1999) Current status of laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6: 154-164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, Campbell DA Jr, Magee JC, Punch JD, Turcotte JG, Konnak JW (2001) Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 72: 284-290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yasutomo K, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, Mizuguchi T, Koito K, Katuramaki T (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg 189: 734-737

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeyuki Misawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Misawa, T., Shiba, H., Usuba, T. et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 21, 1446–1449 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9149-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9149-9

Keywords

Navigation