Abstract
Background
Several large series of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) have been published, largely focusing on immediate results and short-term complications. The aim of this study was to examine the results of LDN and collect medium-term and long-term donor followup.
Methods
We examined the results of two surgeons who performed 500 consecutive LDNs from 1996 to 2005. Prospective databases were reviewed for both donors and recipients to record demographics, medical history, intraoperative events, and complications. Patients were followed between 1 month and 9 years after surgery to assess for delayed complications, especially hypertension, renal insufficiency, incisional hernia, bowel obstruction, and chronic pain.
Results
Left kidneys were procured in 86.2% of cases. Mean operative time was 3.5 h, and warm ischemia time averaged 3.4 min. Hand-assistance was used in 13.8%, and conversion rate was 1.8%. Intraoperative complication rate was 5.8% and was predominantly bleeding (93.1%). Most (86.2%) of the operative complications occurred during the initial 150 cases of a surgeon, compared with 10.3% in the subsequent 150 cases (p = 0.003). Operative time decreased by 87 min after the initial 150 cases (p < 0.001). Immediate graft survival was 97.5%. Delayed graft function occurred in 3.0% of recipients, and acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7.0%. Thirty-day donor complication rate was 9.8%. Mean donor creatinine was 1.24 on the first postoperative day, 1.27 at 2 weeks, and 1.24 at 1 year. At a mean followup of 32.8 months, long-term donor complications consisted of 11 cases of hypertension, 9 cases of prolonged pain or paresthesia, 2 incisional hernias, 1 small bowel obstruction requiring laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, and 1 hydrocele requiring repair.
Conclusions
LDN can be performed with acceptable immediate morbidity and excellent graft function. Operative time and complications decreased significantly after a surgeon performed 150 cases. Long-term complications were uncommon but included a likely underestimated incidence of hypertension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ciszek M, Paczek L, Rowinski W (2003) Clinical outcome of living kidney donation. Transplant Proc 35: 1179
Dunn JF, Nylander WA Jr, Richie RE, Johnson HK, MacDonell RC Jr, Sawyers JL (1986) Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg 203: 637–643
Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, Boulware LE, Ratner LE (2006) Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 243: 126–130
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, Fink J, Farney A, Philosphe B, Jarrell B, Bartlett ST (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 164: 1494–1499
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171:47–51
Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 136: 881–890
Lind MY, Zur Borg IM, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Alwayn IP, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2005) The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: a retrospective study. Transplantation 80: 700–703
Lindstrom P, Haggman M, Wadstrom J (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 422–425
London T, Ho HS, Neuhaus AM, Wolfe BM, Rudich SM, Perez RV (2000) Effect of intravascular volume expansion on renal function during prolonged CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Ann Surg 231: 195–201
Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, Farney AC, Lim JW, Johnson LB, Jacobs S, Flowers JL, Cho ES, Bartlett ST (2005) Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68: 497–502
Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavaoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049
Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng G, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D (2001) Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 166: 1270–1274
Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, Bluebond-Langer R, Kavoussi LR (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240: 358–363
Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Gridgewater FH, Maddern GJ (2004) A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 78: 404–414
Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, Desai NM, Campos L, Palanjian M, Wocjik M, Bloom R, Grossman RA, Mange K, Barker CF, Naji A, Markmann JF (2002) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 74: 169–172
Watnick TJ, Jenkins RR, Rackoff P, Baumgarten A, Bia MJ (1988) Microalbuminuria and hypertension in long-term renal donors. Transplantation 45:59–65
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Paul Hebert, PhD, for providing invaluable assistance with statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chin, E.H., Hazzan, D., Herron, D.M. et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 21, 521–526 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y