Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy—a reappraised technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastrostomy is the best alternative for long-term enteral feeding when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not possible. The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility, complications, adequacy of feeding support, and tolerability of laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy (LWG) in head and neck cancer patients. The initial results and the results of extended follow-up were evaluated.

Methods

A consecutive series of 48 patients with stenotic head and neck or esophageal cancer were referred for laparoscopic gastrostomy. The patients consisted of 42 men and 6 women aged 36 to 82 years (mean, 54 years). After laparoscopic placement of a Foley catheter of 16 F into the stomach, a seromuscular tunnel 4 cm in length is created, embedding the catheter by interrupted sutures. Three stay sutures for gastropexy are fixed and tied on the abdominal skin at the end of the procedure. The mean duration of the procedure was 62.4 ± 11 min (52–124 min).

Results

Laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy could be performed successfully in all patients with aerodigestive cancer. None of the laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement procedures was converted to an open surgery, and none of the 48 patients in this series died as a result of the laparoscopic procedure. All LWG complications (11%) were minor, consisting of superficial wound infections, balloon rupture, and chronic granulation. No major complications were encountered. The mean usage time of gastrostomy was 6.3 ± 5.3 months.

Conclusions

Current techniques of LWG could be an alternative to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for long-term enteral access, because it has proved to be safe and reproducible with relatively few complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Au FC (1993) The Stamm gastrostomy: a sound procedure. Am Surg 59:674–675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey CE, Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM, Jacobs JR (1992) A comparison of gastrostomy techniques in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:124–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brink M8, Hagan K, Rosemurgy AS (1993) Laparoscopic insertion of the Moss feeding tube. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:531–534

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campos AC, Butters M, Meguid MM (1990) Home enteral nutrition via gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 12:137–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cunliffe DR, Swanton C, White C, Watt-Smith SR, Cook TA, George BD (2000) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at the time of tumour resection in advanced oral cancer. Oral Oncol 36:471–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duh QY, Way LW (1993) Laparoscopic gastrostomy using t-fasteners as retractors and anchors. Surg Endosc 7:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edelman DS, Arroyo PJ, Unger SW (1994) Laparoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A comparison. Surg Endosc 8:47–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gauderer M, Ponsky J, Izant R (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 15:872–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jatoi A, Loprinzi C (2001) Current management of cancer associated anorexia and weight loss. Oncology 15:497–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnston WD, Lopez MJ, Kraybill WG, Bricker EM (1982) Experience with a modified Witzel gastrostomy without gastropexy. Ann Surg 195:692–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP (1987) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology 93:48–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee WJ, Chao SH, Chang S, Chen KM (1994) Laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy tube placement. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:201–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mamel JJ (1989) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrstomy. Am J Gastroenterol 84:703–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mequid MM, Williams LF (1979) The use of gastrostomy to correct malnutrition. Surg Gynecol Obstet 149:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murayama KM, Johnson TJ, Thompson JS (1996) Laparoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy are safe and effective for obtaining enteral access. Am J Surg 172:591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Naud JP, Casa C, Manunta A (1995) Laparoscopic continent gastrostomy. Am J Surg 169:629–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nayel H, el-Ghoneimy E, el-Haddad S (1992) Impact of nutritional supplementation on treatment delay and morbidity in patients with head and neck tumors treated with irradiation. Nutrition 8:13–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peitgen K, Walz MK, Krause U, Eigler FW (1997) First results of laparoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 11: 658–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Piquet MA, Ozsahin M, Larpin I, Zouhair A, Coti P, Monney M, Monnier P, Mirimanoff RO, Roulet M (2002) Early nutritional intervention in oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 10:502–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reiner DS, Leitman IM, Ward RJ (1991) Laparoscopic Stamm gastrostomy with gastropexy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:189–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritz JP, Germer CT, Buhr HJ (1998) Laparoscopic gastrostomy according to Janeway. Surg Endosc 12:894–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shellito PC, Malt RA (1985) Tube gastrostomy: techniques and complications. Ann Surg 201:180–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung City, 807, Taiwan

    J.-S. Hsieh, C.-F. Wu, F.-M. Chen, J.-Y. Wang & T.-J. Huang

Authors
  1. J.-S. Hsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C.-F. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F.-M. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.-Y. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T.-J. Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-Y. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, JS., Wu, CF., Chen, FM. et al. Laparoscopic Witzel gastrostomy—a reappraised technique. Surg Endosc 21, 793–797 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9018-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9018-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation