Skip to main content
Log in

Early versus late repair of bile duct injuries

  • Biliary Tract Forum
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biliary injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy occur at a constant rate of 0.3% to 0.6%. The spectrum of injures ranges from small leaks of bile to complete section of the main ducts requiring bilioenteric reconstruction. The goal of biliary reconstruction is to obtain a high-quality bilioenteric anastomosis that will not malfunction for a long time. No prospective, controlled, randomized trial (evidence level 1) has been conducted that shows whether an early repair is better than a late one. The timing of the operative procedure should be individualized. A complete examination of the patient should be performed to identify the type of injury and coexistent comorbidities. For septic patients and those with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, the repair should be delayed. Maneuvers to drain the bile ducts can be performed to relieve jaundice and cholangitis in these patients. For these cases, the surgery should be delayed. If a stable patient is found, without comorbidities, the operation can be scheduled earlier. Subhepatic drains should not be left for a long period because of the risk for intestinal fistulization. If needed, they should be changed for transhepatic stents. High-quality bilioenteric anastomoses are performed with fine absorbable sutures for healthy ducts (nonscarred, noninflamed, nonischemic) in a wide opening, with anastomosis of a (tension-free) defunctionalized jejunal limb. Individualization of the patient is the best rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chapman WC, Abecassis M, Jarnagin W, Mulvihill S, Strasberg SM (2003) Bile duct injuries 12 years after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7: 412–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lillemoe, Melton GB, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ (2000) Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg 232: 430–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mercado MA (2004) From Langenbuch to Strasberg: the spectrum of bile duct injuries. Rev Invest Clin 56: 649–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Hinojosa CA, Podgaetz E, Ramos-Gallardo G, Galvez-Treviño R, Valdez-Villarreal M (2005) Prognostic implications of preserved bile duct confluence after iatrogenic injury. Hepatogastroenterology 52: 40–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Podgaetz E, Estuardo Porras-Aguilar D, Lozano RR, Dávila-Cervantes A (2004) Iatrogenic intestinal injury concomitant to iatrogenic bile duct injury: the second component. Curr Surg 64: 380–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Tielve M, Hinojosa CA (2003) Acute bile duct injury: the need for a high repair. Surg Endosc 17: 1351–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Villalta JM, Barajas-Olivas A, Eraña J, Domínguez I (2006) Long-term evaluation of biliary reconstruction after partial resection of segments IV and V in iatrogenic injuries. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 77–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mercado MA, Chan C, Tielve M, Contreras A, Galvez-Treviño R, Ramos-Gallardo G, Orozco H (2002) Iatrogenic injury of the bile duct: experience with repair in 180 patients. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 65: 245–249

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mercado MA, Orozco H, De la Garza L, Lopez-Martinez LM, Contreras A, Guillen-Navarro E (1999) Biliary duct injury: partial segment IV resection for intrahepatic reconstruction of biliary lesions. Arch Surg 134: 1008–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pickleman J, Marsan R, Borge M (2000) Portoenterostomy: an old treatment for a new disease. Arch Surg 135: 811–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart L, Robinson TN, Lee CM, Liu K, Whang K, Way LW (2004) Right hepatic artery injury associated with laparoscopic bile duct injury: incidence, mechanism, and consequences. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180: 101–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Strasberg SM, Picus DD, Drebin JA (2001) Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 266–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh RM, Vogt DP, Ponsky JL, Brown N, Mascha E, Henderson JM (2004) Management of failed biliary repairs for major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199: 192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Angel Mercado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercado, M.A. Early versus late repair of bile duct injuries. Surg Endosc 20, 1644–1647 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0490-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0490-9

Keywords

Navigation