Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An antireflux stent versus conventional stents for palliation of distal esophageal or cardia cancer: a randomized clinical study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Self-expandable metal stents placed across the esophagogastric junction for palliative treatment of malignant strictures may lead to gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration. This study compared the effects of a Dua antireflux stent with those of a conventional stent.

Methods

Patients with incurable cancer of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia were randomly assigned to receive an antireflux stent (n = 19) or a standard stent (n = 22) at nine Swedish hospitals during the period September 1, 2003 to July 31, 2005. Complications were recorded at clinical follow-up visits. Survival rates were assessed through linkage to the Population Register. Dysphagia, reflux symptoms, esophageal pain, dyspnea, and global quality of life were assessed as changes in mean scores between baseline and 1 month after stent insertion through validated questionnaires.

Results

No technical problems occurred during stent placement in the 41 enrolled patients. Fewer patients with complications were observed in the antireflux stent group (n = 3) than in the standard group (n = 8), but no statistically significant difference was shown (p = 0.14). The survival rates were similar in the two groups (p = 0.99; hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.5–2.0). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of studied esophageal or respiratory symptoms or quality of life. Clinically relevant improvement in dysphagia occurred in both groups. Dyspnea decreased after antireflux stent insertion (mean score change, –11), and increased after insertion of standard stent (mean score change, +21).

Conclusions

Antireflux stents may be used without increased risk of complications, mortality, esophageal symptoms, or reduced global quality of life. These results should encourage large-scale randomized trials that can establish potentially beneficial effects of antireflux stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Winstone K, Steyn R, Hammerlid E, Arraras J, Farndon JR (1996) Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality-of-life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Eur J Cancer 32A: 1912–1917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dua KS, Kozarek R, Kim J, Evans J, Medda BK, Lang I, Hogan WJ, Shaker R (2001) Self-expanding metal esophageal stent with anti-reflux mechanism. Gastrointest Endosc 53: 603–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjurdal K, Sullivan M, Curran D, Groenvold M (1999) The EORTC QLQ-C 30 Scoring Manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium

  5. Homs MY, Wahab PJ, Kuipers EJ, Steyerberg EW, Grool TA, Haringsma J, Siersema PD (2004) Esophageal stents with antireflux valve for tumors of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 695–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. King MT (1996) The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 5: 555–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knyrim K, Wagner HJ, Bethge N, Keymling M, Vakil N (1993) A controlled trial of an expansile metal stent for palliation of esophageal obstruction due to inoperable cancer. N Engl J Med 329: 1302–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laasch HU, Marriott A, Wilbraham L, Tunnah S, England RE, Martin DF (2002) Effectiveness of open versus antireflux stents for palliation of distal esophageal carcinoma and prevention of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Radiology 225: 359–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nunes CC, Waechter FL, Sampaio JA, Pinto RD, Aluares- Da-Silva MR, Pereira-Lima L (1999) Comparative postoperative study of prostheses with an antireflux valve system in the palliative treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 46: 2859–2864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16: 139–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shim CS, Jung IS, Cheon YK, Ryu CB, Hong SJ, Kim JO, Cho JY, Lee JS, Lee MS, Kim BS (2005) Management of malignant stricture of the esophagogastric junction with a newly designed self-expanding metal stent with an antireflux mechanism. Endoscopy 37: 335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Valbuena J (1984) Endoscopic palliative treatment of esophageal and cardial cancer: a new antireflux prosthesis: a study of 40 cases. Cancer 53: 993–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wenger U, Luo J, Lundell L, Lagergren J (2005) A nationwide study of the use of self-expanding stents in patients with esophageal cancer in Sweden. Endoscopy 37: 329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu WC, Katon RM, Saxon RR, Barton RE, Uchida BT, Keller FS, Rosch J (1994) Silicone-covered self-expanding metallic stents for the palliation of malignant esophageal obstruction and esophagorespiratory fistulas: experience in 32 patients and a review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc 40: 22–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Eja Fridsta for study coordination, and to contact doctors not included among the authors, namely, John Blomberg, Stefan Linder, Angelica Pannes, Dag Stockeld, Ervin Toth, and Sören Vallgren. Funding was provided by the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer and Traffic Injury Fund, and Wilson-Cooks Medicals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lagergren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenger, U., Johnsson, E., Arnelo, U. et al. An antireflux stent versus conventional stents for palliation of distal esophageal or cardia cancer: a randomized clinical study. Surg Endosc 20, 1675–1680 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0088-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0088-2

Keywords

Navigation