Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Restoration of bowel continuity after Hartmann’s procedure is a major surgical procedure associated with substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. The authors review their experience with laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure (LARH) to assess difficulties and potential advantages associated with this procedure.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of a prospectively entered database was performed to identify patients who underwent LARH over a period of 7 years. Data regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative course were reviewed. Specifically, age, gender, diagnosis at initial operation, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, comorbidities, operative time, conversion, surgical team, complications, postoperative bowel movements, and hospital stay were assessed. All surgeries were performed by six experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Results

A total of 27 patients, 17 men and 10 women, with mean ages of 58.1 and 62.9 years, respectively, underwent LARH. The procedure was laparoscopically completed for 23 patients. Conversion to laparotomy was required for four patients (14.8%) because of dense adhesions after the initial Hartmann’s procedure in three patients and rectal perforation in one patient. The median operative time was 226 min, and the median hospital stay was 6 days. The overall morbidity rate was 33% (9 patients), attributable to colostomy site infection in 5 of the 9 patients. One patient required reoperation because of intraabdominal bleeding. No anastomotic leaks or intraabdominal abscesses were recorded. There was no operative mortality.

Conclusions

Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure is technically challenging and time consuming. However, in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, it is safe and associated with a reasonably low conversion rate. Furthermore, the relatively low morbidity rate, short hospital stay, and earlier return of bowel function may be beneficial to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson CA, Fowler DL, White S, Wintz N (1993) Laparoscopic colostomy closure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 69–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck DE (1997) The role of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane in adhesion prevention. Eur J Surg 577(Suppl): 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, et al. (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183: 297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozzetti F, Nava M, Bufalino R, et al. (1983) Early local complications following colostomy closure in cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 26: 25–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costantino GN, Mukalian GG. (1994) Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. J Laparoendosc Surg 4: 429–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Demetriades D, Pezikis A, Melissas J, Parekh D, Pickles G. (1988) Factors influencing the morbidity of colostomy closure. Am J Surg 155: 594–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fine AP, Lanasa S, Gannon MP, Cline CW, James R (1995) Laparoscopic colon surgery: report of a series. Am Surg 61: 412–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghorra SG, Rzeczycki TP, Natarajan R, Pricolo VE (1991) Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity. Am Surg 65: 266–269

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gorey TF, O’Connell PR, Waldron D, Cronin K, Kerin M, Fitzpatrick JM (1993) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 80: 109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffa C, Basilico V, Bellotti R, Sacchi F, Senatore S, Griffa A, Capriata G. (2004) Colon recanalization after Hartmann’s procedure: a challenge for the surgeon or a strategy to be changed? Minerva Chir 59: 489–493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartmann H (1923) Note sur un procede: nouveau d’extirpation des cancers de la partie terminale du colon. Bulletin et Memories de la Societe Chirurgique de Paris 1974–1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holland JC, Winter DC, Richardson D (2002) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 291–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keck JO, Collopy BT, Ryan PJ, Fink R, Mackay JR, Woods RJ (1994) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khosraviani K, Campbell WJ, Parks TG, Irwin ST (2000) Hartmann procedure revisited. Eur J Surg 166: 878–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10: 15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Livingston DH, Miller FB, Richardson JD (1989) Are the risks after colostomy closure exaggerated? Am J Surg 158: 17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW (2003) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13: 63

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lucarini L, Galleano R, Lombezzi R, Ippoliti M, Ajraldi G. (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted Hartmann’s reversal with the Dexterity Pneumo Sleeve. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1164–1167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Macphrenson SC, Hansell DT, Porteous C (1996) Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a simple technique and audit of twelve cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 6: 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maggard MA, Zingmond D, O’Connell JB, Ko CY (2004) What proportion of patients with an ostomy (for diverticulitis) gets reversed? Am Surg 70: 928–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mosdell DM, Doberneck RC (1992) Morbidity and mortality of ostomy closure. Am J Surg 162: 633–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ (1992) Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 79: 839–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pittmann DM, Smith LE (1985) Complications of colostomy closure. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 836–843

    Google Scholar 

  24. Regadas FS, Siebra JA, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Reis Neto JA (1996) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal anastomosis post-Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Lap Endosc 6: 1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A, Brown C, Brodribb AJ (1991) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 78: 1167–1170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Puente J, Mckenney MG, Hartmann R (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vacher C, Zaghloul R, Borie F, Laporte S, Callafe R, Skawinski P, Leynau G, Domergue J (2002) Laparoscopic reestablishment of digestive continuity following Hartmann’s procedure: retrospective study of the French Society of Endoscopic Surgery. Ann Chir 127:189–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Ye TM, Cattey RP, Henry LG. (1994) Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favorably with open technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 25–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Varnell J, Pemberton LB (1981) Risk factors in colostomy closure. Surgery 89: 683–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vernava AM, Liebscher G, Long WE (1995) Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure. Surg Lap Endosc 5: 129–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    M. Khaikin, O. Zmora, D. Rosin, B. Bar-Zakai, Y. Goldes, M. Shabtai, A. Ayalon & Y. Munz

Authors
  1. M. Khaikin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Zmora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Rosin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Bar-Zakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y. Goldes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Shabtai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Ayalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Y. Munz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Khaikin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khaikin, M., Zmora, O., Rosin, D. et al. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Surg Endosc 20, 1883–1886 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0848-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0848-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation