Skip to main content
Log in

Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A number of studies have investigated several aspects of feasibility and validity of performance assessments with virtual reality surgical simulators. However, the validity of performance assessments is limited by the reliability of such measurements, and some issues of reliability still need to be addressed. This study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that test subjects show logarithmic performance curves on repetitive trials for a component task of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a virtual reality simulator, and that interindividual differences in performance after considerable training are significant. According to kinesiologic theory, logarithmic performance curves are expected and an individual’s learning capacity for a specific task can be extrapolated, allowing quantification of a person’s innate ability to develop task-specific skills.

Methods

In this study, 20 medical students at the University of Basel Medical School performed five trials of a standardized task on the LS 500 virtual reality simulator for laparoscopic surgery. Task completion time, number of errors, economy of instrument movements, and maximum speed of instrument movements were measured.

Results

The hypothesis was confirmed by the fact that the performance curves for some of the simulator measurements were very close to logarithmic curves, and there were significant interindividual differences in performance at the end of the repetitive trials.

Conclusions

Assessment of perceptual motor skills and the innate ability of an individual with no prior experience in laparoscopic surgery to develop such skills using the LS 500 VR surgical simulator is feasible and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haluck RS, Krummel TM (2000) Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135: 786–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413: 379–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V, Koehl C, Cotin S, Russier Y, Mutter D, Delingette H, Ayache N (1998) Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg 228: 627–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorman PJ, Meier AH, Krummel TM (1999) Simulation and virtual reality in surgical education: real or unreal? Arch Surg 134: 1203–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bridges M, Diamond DL (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177: 28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tendick F, Downes M, Cavusoglu M, Gantert W, Way LW (1998) Development of virtual environments for training skills and reducing errors in laparoscopic surgery. SPIE Conference 3262 on Surgical-Assist Systems, San Jose, CA pp 36–44

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao C, MacKenzie CL, Ibbotson JA, Turner LJ, Blair NP, Nagy AG (1999) Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 62: 83–89

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Crothers I, Browning J (1999) Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical traininer virtual reality (MIST-VR). Endoscopy 31: 310–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Szekely G, Satava RM (1999) Virtual reality in medicine. BMJ 319:1305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Toole RV, Playter RR, Krummel TM, Blank WC, Cornelius NH, Roberts WR, Bell WJ, Raibert M (1999) Measuring and developing suturing technique with a virtual reality surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 189: 114–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaudhry A, Sutton C, Wood J, Stone R, McCloy R (1999) Learning rate for laparoscopic skills on MIST-VR, a virtual simulator: quality of human–computer interface. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81: 281–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taffinder NJ, McManus IC, Gul Y, Russell RCG, Darzi A (1998) Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopy simulator. Lancet 352: 1191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill: needs to become more objective. BMJ 318: 887–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, Cleave-Hogg D (2001) The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology 95: 36–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McGlade K, McClure N (2000) A comparison between randomly alternative imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition. Am J Surg 180: 208–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18: 121–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J (2002) Face, expert, and a referent validity of the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 16: 1764–1770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schijven MP, Jakimowicz J (2003) Construct validity: experts and residents performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17: 803–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91: 146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Risucci DA, Tortolani AJ (1990) A methodological framework for the design of research on the evaluation of residents. Acad Med 65: 36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt RA (1982) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ivry R (1996) Representational issues in motor learning: phenomena and theory. In: Handbook of perception and action. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

  23. Hanna GB, Drew T, Clinch P, Shimi S, Dunkley P, Hau C, Cuschieri A (1997) Psychomotor skills for endoscopic manipulations: differing abilities between right- and left-handed individuals. Ann Surg 225: 333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reznick R (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165: 358–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rosenthal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthal, R., Gantert, W.A., Scheidegger, D. et al. Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery?. Surg Endosc 20, 1286–1290 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0635-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0635-2

Keywords

Navigation