Abstract
Background
Advanced medical simulators have predominantly been used to shorten the learning curve of endoscopy for medical students and young residents. Rarely have the effects of visuospatial ability and attitudes of intermediately experienced and experienced specialists been studied with regard to simulator training. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of visuospatial ability and attitude on performance in simulator training.
Methods
Eighteen surgical residents were included in the study. Prior to the simulated gastroscopy task, they performed a visuospatial test (the card rotation test). After the simulated gastroscopy task, they completed a questionnaire regarding flow experiences. Their results were compared with those of 11 expert endoscopists who performed the same tests.
Results
Total gastroscopy time was significantly shorter for the expert endoscopists compared to residents (2 min 11 sec, p = 0.003). There was also a trend of more mucosa inspected (p = 0.088) and higher efficiency of screening (p = 0.069) by the experts. The residents made fewer errors in the card rotation test than the expert endoscopists (2.5 ± 0.8 vs 5.5 ± 1.2, respectively; p = 0.034), and their visuospatial card rotation test results correlated better with their performance in the simulated gastroscopy.
Conclusions
A virtual gastroscopy task presents more of an emotional as well as a psychomotoric challenge to intermediately experienced endoscopists than to senior experts. Our study demonstrates that these differences can be objectively assessed by the use of visuospatial ability tests, flowsheets, and an endoscopic simulator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamsen S, Funch-Jensen PM, Drewes AM, Rosenberg J, Grantcharov TP (2005) A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy. Surg Endosc 19: 229–234
Csikszentmihalyi M, Rathunde K (1992) The measurement of flow in everyday life: toward a theory of emergent motivation. Nebr Symp Motiv 40: 57–97
Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harmann HH (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Enochsson L, Isaksson B, Tour R, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Wredmark T, Tsai-Fellander L (2004) Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 8: 876–882
Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP (2004) Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 18: 1514–1518
Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H, Rosen M, Fanning A, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM (2005) Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189: 497–500
Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A, Schillinger M, Haefner M, Gangl A, Schoefl R (2002) Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 34: 698–702
Gallagher A, Crothers I, Satava R (2004) Objective measures of visuo-spatial ability for minimally invasive surgery. Paper presented at the 12th European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Congress, Barcelona, Spain
Ghani JA, Deshpande SP (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human–computer interaction. J Psychol 128: 381–391
Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91: 146–150
Mahmood T, Darzi A (2004) The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc 18: 1224–1230
Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Lederman AB, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7: 871–878
Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2002) Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator. Acad Med 77: 750–751
Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2003) Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 57: 214–218
Sedlack RE, Kolars JC, Alexander JA (2004) Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2: 348–352
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458–463
Strom P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Johnson E, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2003) Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 17: 227–231
Strom P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2004) Training in tasks with different visual–spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance. Surg Endosc 18: 115–120
Westman B, Ritter EM, Kjellin A, Törkvist L, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L, Enochsson L (2006) Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopists in simulated colonoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg xx: xx–xx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enochsson, L., Westman, B., Ritter, E.M. et al. Objective assessment of visuospatial and psychomotor ability and flow of residents and senior endoscopists in simulated gastroscopy. Surg Endosc 20, 895–899 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0593-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0593-8