Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results from percutaneous drainage of Hinchey stage II diverticulitis guided by computed tomography scan

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous abscess drainage guided by computed tomography scan is considered the initial step in the management of patients presenting with Hinchey II diverticulitis. The rationale behind this approach is to manage the septic complication conservatively and to follow this later using elective sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis.

Methods

The clinical outcomes for Hinchey II patients who underwent percutaneous abscess drainage in our institution were reviewed. Drainage was considered a failure when signs of continuing sepsis developed, abscess or fistula recurred within 4 weeks of drainage, and emergency surgical resection with or without a colostomy had to be performed.

Results

A total of 34 patients (17 men and 17 women; median age, 71 years; range, 34–90 years) were considered for analysis. The median abscess size was 6 cm (range, 3–18 cm), and the median duration of drainage was 8 days (range, 1–18 days). Drainage was considered successful for 23 patients (67%). The causes of failure for the remaining 11 patients included continuing sepsis (n = 5), abscess recurrence (n = 5), and fistula formation (n = 1). Ten patients who failed percutaneous abscess drainage underwent an emergency Hartmann procedure, with a median delay of 14 days (range, 1–65 days) between drainage and surgery. Three patients in this group (33%) died in the immediate postoperative period. Among the 23 patients successfully drained, 12 underwent elective sigmoid resection with a primary anastomosis. The median delay between drainage and surgery was 101 days (range, 40–420 days). In this group, there were no anastomotic leaks and no mortality.

Conclusion

Drainage of Hinchey II diverticulitis guided by computed scan was successful in two-thirds of the cases, and 35% of the patients eventually underwent a safe elective sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis. By contrast, failure of percutaneous abscess drainage to control sepsis is associated with a high mortality rate when an emergency resection is performed. The current results demonstrate that percutaneous abscess drainage is an effective initial therapeutic approach for patients with Hinchey II diverticulitis, and that emergency surgery should be avoided whenever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PH, Richards MB (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12: 85–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The standards task force, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2000) Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Consensus statement (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 13: 430–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stollmann NH, Raskin JB (1999) Ad Hoc Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology: Diagnosis and management of diverticular disease of the colon in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 94: 3110–3121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks TG (1969) Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon: a review of 521 cases. BMJ 4: 639–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferzoco LB, Raptopoulos V, Silen W (1998) Acute diverticulitis. New Engl J Med 338: 1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. vanSonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Goodacre BW, Casola G, D’Agostino HB (2001). Percutaneous abscess drainage: update. World J Surg 25: 362–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stinner B (2001) Invited commentary. World J Surg 25: 370–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambrosetti P, Jenny A, Becker C, Terrier F, Morel Ph (2000) Acute left colonic diverticulitis: compared performance of computed tomography and water-soluble contrast enema: prospective evaluation of 420 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1363–1367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaiser AM, Jiang JK, Lake JP, Ault G, Artinyan A, Gonzalez-Ruiz C, Essani R, Beart RW Jr (2005) The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Labs JD, Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Siegelman SS, Cameron JL (1988) Complications of acute diverticulitis of the colon: improved early diagnosis with computerized tomography. Am J Surg 155: 331–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aydin HN, Remzi FH (2004) Diverticulitis: when and how to operate? Dig Liver Dis; 36: 435–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Belmonte C, Klas JV, Perez JJ, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) The Hartmann procedure: first choice or last resort in diverticular disease. Arch Surg 131: 612–617

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J (1997) Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 84: 380–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kockerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, et al (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis: results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13: 567–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer C, Rohr S, Iderne A, Tiberio G, Bourtoul C (1997) The value of preoperative colonic lavage in urgent colonic sugery: a propos of 54 patients. J Chir 134: 271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S, Lermite E, Tuech JJ, Brehant O, Arnaud JP (2003) Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 18: 503–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brolin RE, Flancbaum L, Ercoli FR, Milgrim LM, Bocage JP, Blum A, Needell GS, Nosher JL (1991) Limitations of percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173: 203–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cinat ME, Wilson SE, Din AM (2002) Determinants for successful percutaneous image-guided drainage of intraabdominal abscess. Arch Surg 137: 845–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mueller PR, Saini S, Wittenburg J, Simeone J, Hahn PF, Steiner E, et al (1987) Sigmoid diverticular abscesses: percutaneous drainage as an adjunct to surgical resection in 24 cases. Radiology 164: 321–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farmakis N, Tudor RG, Keighley MRB (1994) The 5-year natural history of complicated diverticular disease. Br J Surg 81: 733–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bahadursingh AM, Virgo KS, Kaminski DL, Longo WE (2003) Spectrum of disease and outcome of complicated diverticular disease. Am J Surg 186: 696–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernini A, Spencer MP, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (1997) Computed tomography-guided percutaneous abscess drainage in intestinal disease: factors associated with outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee EC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ Jr (1997) Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 669–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salem L, Anaya DA, Flum DR (2005) Temporal changes in the management of diverticulitis. J Surg Res 124: 318–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schechter S, Eisenstat TE, Oliver GC, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP (1994) Computerized tomographic scan-guided drainage of intraabdominal abscesses: preoperative and postoperative modalities in colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 984–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neff CC, vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Wittich GR, Hoyt DB, Halasz NA, Martini DJ (1987) Diverticular abscesses: percutaneous drainage. Radiology 163: 15–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tudor RG, Farmakis N, Keighley MR (1994) National audit of complicated diverticular disease: analysis of index cases. Br J Surg 81: 730–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J (1997) Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 84: 380–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Janes S, Meagher A, Frizelle FA (2005) Elective surgery after acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg 92: 133–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Gervaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durmishi, Y., Gervaz, P., Brandt, D. et al. Results from percutaneous drainage of Hinchey stage II diverticulitis guided by computed tomography scan. Surg Endosc 20, 1129–1133 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0574-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0574-y

Keywords

Navigation