Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 0.3% to 1.0%. This is higher than the incidence reported for open cholecystectomy (i.e., 0.1–0.2%), and the surgeons all over the world are relentlessly trying to find the ways and means to lower this incidence. Various operating strategies, techniques, and instrumentations such as the 0° telescope, intraoperative cholangiogram, hydrodissection, and peanut gauze dissection have been claimed by various authors to minimize the risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. However, the surgical fraternity agrees that there has been no substitute for meticulous dissection and display of various vital structures near the common bile duct. The authors describe seven anatomic landmarks encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that assist in safe dissection to prevent bile duct and vascular injury. On the basis of their experience, they believe that if surgeons adhere to these landmarks, excellent results can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 382–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holohan TV (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 324: 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Eng J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baily RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 214: 531–541

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston GW (1986) Iatrogenic bile duct stricture: an avoidable surgical hazard? Br J Surg 73: 245–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shoemaker LCP, Baxter CJC (1971) An extrahepatic biliary tract anomaly suggested technique for early identification at surgery. Am J Surg 121: 741–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitahama A, Kerstien MD, Overby JL, Kappelman MD, Webb WR (1986) Routine intraoperative cholangiogram. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162: 317–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Strassberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180: 101–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crade M, Taylor KJ, Rosenfield AT, Walsh JW (1980) Ultrasonic imaging of pericholecystic inflammation. J Am Med Assoc 244: 708–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kum CK, Goh PMY, Isaac JR, Tekant Y, Ngoi SS (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 81: 1651–1654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adkins RB Jr, Chapman WC, Reddy VS (2000) Embryology, anatomy, and surgical applications of the extrahepatic biliary system. Surg Clin North Am 80: 363–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yushi T, Kenichi I, Ken K, Yukio Y, Masahiko O (1993) Introduction of a “safety zone” for the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 88: 1258–1261

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haubrich WS (2002) Calot of the triangle of Calot. Gastroenterology 123: 1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergamaschi R, Ignjatovic D (2000) More than two structures in Calot’s triangle: a postmortem study. Surg Endosc 14: 354–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rouviere H (1924) Sur la configuration et la signification du sillon du processus caude. Bulletins et memoires de la societe Anatomique de Paris 94: 355–358

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A (1997) Rouviere’s sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1253–1254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarcoveanu E, Niculescu D, Georgescu S, Epure O, Bradea C (2005) Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 100: 437–444

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, Acapito DF, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56,591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140: 986–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Metcalfe MS, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ (2004) Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? Am J Surg 187: 475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilliams A, Cheslyn-Curtis S, Russell RC, Lees WR (1992) Can cholangiography be safely abandoned in laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 74: 248–251

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Nathanson LK, Pietrabissa A (1994) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: routine vs selective policy. Surg Endosc 8: 302–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Misra M, Schiff J, Rendon G, Rothschild J, Schwaitzberg S (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc 19: 1266–1271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barwood NT, Valinsky LJ, Hobbs MS, Fletcher DR, Knuiman NW, Ridout SC (2002) Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in western Australia: implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 235: 41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flum DR, Dellinger P, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289: 1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hermann RE (1976) A plea for a safer technique of cholecystectomy. Surgery 79: 609–611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001, India

    K. Singh & A. Ohri

Authors
  1. K. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ohri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ohri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K., Ohri, A. Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20, 1754–1758 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0528-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0528-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation