Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does open surgery continue to have a role in elective splenectomy?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since it was first reported in 1991, laparoscopic splenectomy has become the procedure of choice for elective splenectomy. However, doubts have been raised regarding the suitability of patients with splenomegaly (>1 kg) for laparoscopic resection because there have been reports of greater morbidity and higher conversion rates in this group of patients. Since 2000, patients referred to the authors’ center for splenectomy with an estimated spleen weight exceeding 1 kg have undergone splenectomy by the open approach.

Methods

Between September 1995 and April 2005, 95 elective splenectomies were performed by a single surgeon. Operative data were collected prospectively.

Results

A comparison between the operations that took place before 2001 (n = 47) and those performed after 2000 (n = 48) for all sizes of spleen showed significant reductions in conversion rate, operative time, and hospital stay in the later group. As compared with laparoscopic splenectomy (n = 11), open splenectomy (n = 18) for cases of splenomegaly resulted in a significantly shorter operative time, less operative blood loss, and no significant difference in hospital stay.

Conclusion

Although laparoscopic splenectomy is the treatment of choice for the majority of patients requiring elective splenectomy, the procedure for patients with significant splenomegaly requires caution and common sense. This study shows that an open splenectomy for these patients significantly reduces operative time and blood loss without increasing morbidity or hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ailawadi G, Yahanda A, Dimick JB, Bedi A, Mulholland MW, Colletti L, Sweeney JF (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with splenomegaly or prior upper abdominal operation. Surgery 132: 689–694, discussion 694–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickerstaff KI, Morris PJ (1987) Splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Br J Surg 74: 346–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borrazzo EC, Daly JM, Morrisey KP, Fischer E, Belmont M, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for giant spleens. Surg Endosc 17: 918–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cesaratto L, Vascotto C, D’Ambrosio C, Scaloni A, Baccarani U, Paron I, Damante G, Calligaris S, Quadrifoglio F, Tiribelli C, Tell G (2005) Overoxidation of peroxiredoxins as an immediate and sensitive marker of oxidative stress in HepG2 cells and its application to the redox effects induced by ischemia/reperfusion in human liver. Free Radic Res 39: 255–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choy C, Cacchione R, Moon V, Ferzli G (2004) Experience with seven cases of massive splenomegaly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Vander Velpen G (1992) Technical aspects of laparoscopic splenectomy: hilar segmental devascularization and instrumentation. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37: 414–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) [Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach: report of a case. Presse Med 20: 2263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ (1999) Laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Surg 23: 384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstone J (1978) Splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. Am J Surg 135: 385–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heniford BT, Park A, Walsh RM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Frenette G, Sing RF (2001) Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with normal-sized spleens versus splenomegaly: does size matter? Am Surg 67: 854–857, discussion 857–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson HA, Deterling RA (1989) Massive splenomegaly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168: 131–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaban GK, Czerniach DR, Cohen R, Novitsky YW, Yood SM, Perugini RA, Kelly JJ, Litwin DE (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 18: 1340–1343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahon D, Rhodes M (2003) Laparoscopic splenectomy: size matters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85: 248–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B, Kau KB, Donaldson N, Rhodes MR, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (2003) Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Ann Surg 238: 235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhodes M, Rudd M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1995) Laparoscopic splenectomy and lymph node biopsy for hematologic disorders. Ann Surg 222: 43–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Romano F, Caprotti R, Franciosi C, De Fina S, Colombo G, Uggeri F (2002) Laparoscopic splenectomy using Ligasure: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 16: 1608–1611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM, Ponsky J (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy vs conventional laparoscopic splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly. Arch Surg 137: 1348–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Targarona EM, Balague C, Cerdan G, Espert JJ, Lacy AM, Visa J, Trias M (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) in cases of splenomegaly: a comparison analysis with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 426–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Targarona EM, Espert JJ, Cerdan G, Balague C, Piulachs J, Sugranes G, Artigas V, Trias M (1999) Effect of spleen size on splenectomy outcome: a comparison of open and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 559–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Terrosu G, Donini A, Baccarani U, Vianello V, Anania G, Zala F, Pasqualucci A, Bresadola F (1998) Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the management of splenomegaly: our preliminary experience. Surgery 124: 839–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Winslow ER, Brunt LM (2003) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a metaanalysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery 134: 647–653, discussion 654–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, UK

    A. P. Boddy, D. Mahon & M. Rhodes

Authors
  1. A. P. Boddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Mahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Rhodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boddy, A.P., Mahon, D. & Rhodes, M. Does open surgery continue to have a role in elective splenectomy?. Surg Endosc 20, 1094–1098 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0523-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0523-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation