Abstract
Background
The effectiveness of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the regression of Barrett’s esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease remains controversial. The aim of this study, therefore, was to review endoscopic findings and clinical changes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease, particularly for patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
Methods
From September 1995 through June 2004, 127 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. All the patients had clinical and endoscopic follow-up evaluation. We further analyzed the course of 37 consecutive patients with Barrett’s esophagus (29% of all laparoscopic fundoplications performed in our institution) using endoscopic surveillance with appropriate biopsies and histologic evaluation. The median follow-up period for all the patients after fundoplication was 34 months (range, 3–108 months). The median follow-up period for the patients with Barrett’s esophagus was 19 months (range, 3–76 months).
Results
During the 9-year period, 70 women (55 %) and 57 (45%) men were treated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The median age of these patients was 42 years (range, 7–81 years). The clinical results were considered excellent for 67 patients (53%), good for 51 patients (40%), fair for 7 patients (6%), and poor for 2 patients (1%). Endoscopic surveillance showed regression of the macroscopic columnar segment in 23 patients with Barrett’s esophagus (62%). Regression at a histopathologic level occurred for 15 patients (40%). The histopathology remained unchanged for 14 patients with Barrett’s esophagus (38%).
Conclusion
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication effectively controls intestinal metaplasia and clinical symptoms in the majority of patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, Lundell L, Margulies M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111: 85–92
Corder AP, Jones RH, Sadler GH, Daniels P, Johnson CD (1996) Heartburn, esophagitis, and Barrett’s esophagus in self-medicating patients in general practice. Br J Clin Pract 50: 245–248
Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Puente G, Korn O, Diaz JC, Maluenda F (1998) Long-term results of classic antireflux surgery in 152 patients with Barrett’s esophagus: clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, manometric, and acid reflux test analysis before and late after operation. Surgery 123: 645–657
Csendes A, Smok G, Burdiles P, Quesada F, Huertas C, Rojas J, Korn O (2000) Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus by endoscopy and histologic studies: a prospective evaluation of 306 control subjects and 376 patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Dis Esophagus 13: 5–11
DeMeester SR, Campos GM, DeMeester TR, Bremner CG, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Crookes PF (1998) The impact of an antireflux procedure on intestinal metaplasia of the cardia. Ann Surg 228: 547–556
DeVault KR, Castell DO (2005) Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 190
Eubanks TR, Omelanczuk P, Richards C, Pohl D, Pellegrini CA (2000) Outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Am J Surg 179: 391—395
Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Madan AK, Stewart ET, Smith C (2003) Selective use of esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring before laparoscopic fundoplication. J Am Coll Surg 197: 358–363
Gurski RR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Bremner CG, Chandrasoma PT, DeMeester TR (2003) Barrett’s esophagus can and does regress after antireflux surgery: a study of prevalence and predictive features. J Am Coll Surg 196: 706–713
Hofstetter WL, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Crookes PF, Tsai P, Banki F, Bremner CG (2001) Long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 234: 532–539
Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Pedersen SA, Liedman B, Hatlebakk JG, Julkonen R, Levander K, Carlsson J, Lamm M, Wiklund I (2001) Continued (5-year) follow-up of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 192: 172–181
Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, Oleynikov D, Pellegrini C (2003) Clinical and pathologic response of Barrett’s esophagus to laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 238: 458–466
Patti MG, Diener U, Tamburini A, Molena D, Way LW (2001) Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 46: 597–602
Richter JE (2001) Antireflux surgery and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: let the truth be told. Gastroenterology 121: 1506–1508
Ritter DW, Vanderpool D, Westmoreland M (1997) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Surg 174: 715–718
Rossetti M, Hell K (1977) Fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in hiatal hernia. World J Surg 1: 439—443
Takeyama S, Numata A, Nenohi M, Shibata Y, Okushiba S, Katoh H (2004) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan. Surg Today 34: 506–509
Winters C, Jr., Spurling TJ, Chobanian SJ, Curtis DJ, Esposito RL, Hacker JF, Johnson DA 3rd, Cruess DF, Cotelingam JD, Gurney MS (1987) Barrett’s esophagus: a prevalent, occult complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 92: 118–124
Yau P, Watson DI, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG (2000) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with Barrett esophagus. Arch Surg 135: 801–805
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Miriam Preen, BSN, RN, for her expertise contributed during the editing process.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozmen, V., Oran, E.S., Gorgun, E. et al. Histologic and clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus. Surg Endosc 20, 226–229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0434-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0434-9