Skip to main content
Log in

Pouch enlargement and band slippage: two different entities

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pouch enlargement and band slippage are the most common late complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Often, confusion exists among surgeons regarding the denomination or even the treatment of these two different entities. This study aimed to establish the differences in clinical presentation, radiologic features, and management between pouch enlargement and band slippage. The authors hypothesized that pouch enlargement can be managed nonoperatively (via band deflation), that band slippage is an acute complication requiring surgical treatment, and that tailored adjustment allows earlier diagnosis of pouch enlargement in asymptomatic patients.

Methods

From March 2001 to December 2004, 516 patients underwent LAGB placement. Barium swallow was performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and during band adjustments (“tailored adjustment”). Pouch enlargement was defined as dilation of the pouch, and band slippage was considered when band and stomach were prolapsed. Four radiologic types of pouch enlargement were considered: band 45°, band 45° with covering of the band, band 0°, and band smaller than 0°.

Results

A total of 1,600 barium swallows were performed with 516 patients. As a result, pouch enlargement was diagnosed for 61 patients (12%) and band slippage for 12 patients (2%).

Conclusion

In this study, pouch enlargement was found to be a chronic complication that can be managed conservatively with a 77% success rate. Tailored adjustment allows early diagnosis of pouch enlargement, thus preventing adjustments in patients with undiagnosed pouch enlargement. Surgical treatment should be considered when medical treatment fails. By comparison, band slippage is an acute complication that requires surgical treatment in every case (100%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Santoro T, Nicodemi O, Da Prato D, Ciannella M, Persico G, Tesauro B (1999) Follow-up of Lap-Band complications. Obes Surg 9: 276–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Germay O, Favretti F, Segato G (2000) Laparoscopic gastroplasty (adjustable silicone gastric banding). Semin Laparosc Surg 7: 55–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman AE, Kiroff G, Game P, Foster B, O’Brien P, Ham J, Maddern GJ (2004) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review. Surgery 135: 326–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chevallier JM, Zinzindohoue F, Douard R, Blanche JP, Berta JL, Altman JJ, Cugnenc PH (2004) Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg 14: 407–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dargent J (1999) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons from the first 500 patients in a single institution. Obes Surg 9: 446–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dargent Jerome MD (2003) Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue? Obes Surg 13: 111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon JB, O’Brien PE (2002) Changes in comorbidities and improvements in quality of life after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg 184: 51S–54S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding GA, Ren CJ (2005) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band. Surg Clin North Am 85: 129–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giusti V, Suter M, Heraief E, Gaillard RC, Burckhardt P (2004) Effects of laparoscopic gastric banding on body composition, metabolic profile, and nutritional status of obese women: 12-months follow-up. Obes Surg 14: 239–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keidar A, Szold A, Carmon E, Blanc A, Abu-Abeid S (2005) Band slippage after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: etiology and treatment. Surg Endosc 19: 262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martikainen T, Pirinen E, Alhava E, Poikolainen E, Paakkonen M, Uusitupa M, Gylling H (2004) Long-term results, late complications, and quality of life in a series of adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 14: 648–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 291: 1238–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien PE, Brown WA, Smith A, McMurrick PJ, Stephens M (1999) Prospective study of a laparoscopically placed, adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Br J Surg 86: 113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB (2002) Weight loss and early and late complications: the international experience. Am J Surg 184: 42S–45S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in overweight among U.S. children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA 288: 1728–1732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ren CJ, Horgan S, Ponce J (2002) US experience with the LAP-BAND system Am Am J Surg 184: 46S–50S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren CJ, Weiner M, Allen JW (2004) Favorable early results of gastric banding for morbid obesity: the American experience. Surg Endosc 18: 543–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubenstein RB (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding at a U.S. Center with up to 3-year follow-up. Obes Surg 12: 380–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarker S, Herold K, Creech S, Shayani V (2004) Early and late complications following adjustable gastric banding. Am Surg 70: 146–149, discussion 149–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, Cabrera I, Siegel N, Ren CJ (2004) Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 14: 514–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suter M (2001) Laparoscopic band repositioning for pouch dilatation/slippage after gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg 11: 507–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suter M, Bettschart V, Giusti V, Heraief E, Jayet A (2000) A 3-year experience with lap gastric banding for obesity. Surg Endosc 14: 532–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Szold A, Abu-Abeid S (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity: results and complications in 715 patients. Surg Endosc 16: 230–233 Epub 2001 Oct 5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tran D, Rhoden DH, Cacchione RN, Baldwin L, Allen JW (2004) Techniques for repair of gastric prolapse after laparoscopic gastric banding. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 117–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vertruyen M (2003) Repositioning the Lap-Band for proximal pouch dilatation. Obes Surg 13: 285–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was in part supported by a grant from the Inamed Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Horgan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moser, F., Gorodner, M.V., Galvani, C.A. et al. Pouch enlargement and band slippage: two different entities. Surg Endosc 20, 1021–1029 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0269-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0269-4

Keywords

Navigation