Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of laparoscopic bariatric workshops on the practice patterns of surgeons

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of a 2-day laparoscopic bariatric workshop on the practice patterns of participating surgeons.

Methods

From October 1998 to June 2002, 18 laparoscopic bariatric workshops were attended by 300 surgeons. Questionnaires were mailed to all participants.

Results

Responses were received from 124 surgeons (41%), among whom were 56 bariatric surgeons (open) (45%), 30 advanced laparoscopic surgeons (24%), and 38 surgeons who performed neither bariatric nor advanced laparoscopic surgery (31%). The questionnaire responses showed that 46 surgeons (37%) currently are performing laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB), 38 (31%) are performing open gastric bypass, and 39 (32%) are not performing bariatric surgery. Since completion of the course, 46 surgeons have performed 8,893 LGBs (mean, 193 cases/surgeon). Overall, 87 of the surgeons (70%) thought that a limited preceptorship was necessary before performance of LGB, yet only 25% underwent this additional training. According to a poll, the respondents thought that, on the average, 50 cases (range, 10–150 cases) are needed for a claim of proficiency.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic bariatric workshops are effective educational tools for surgeons wishing to adopt bariatric surgery. Open bariatric surgeons have the highest rates of adopting laparoscopic techniques and tend to participate in more adjunctive training before performing LGB. There was consensus that the learning curve is steep, and that additional training often is necessary. The authors propose a mechanism for post-residency skill acquisition for advanced laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez-Cordero R (1999) IFSO statement on bariatric surgery: course and workshop requirements. Obes Surg 9: 291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bevan PG (1986) Craft workshops in surgery. Br J Surg 73: 1–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung JY, Sackier JM (1998) A method of objectively evaluating improvement in laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 12: 1111–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Thomson MA, Freemantle N, Wolf F, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A (1999) Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA 282: 867–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dent TL (1991) Training, credentialing, and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J. Surg 161: 399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dent TL (1996) Training and privileging for new procedures. Surg Clin North Am 76: 615–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitts AM, Posner MI (1967) Human performance. In: Grant EM, Whitehead AD (eds) Surgical training. Brooks-Cole. Belmont, CA pp 112–129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guideline for granting of privileges for laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic general surgery. Accessed xxx at: http://www.sages.org/sg_pub14.html

  9. Halsted WS (1904) The training of the surgeon. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 15: 267

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morino M, Festa V, Garrone C (1995) Survey on Torino courses: The impact of a two-day practical course on apprenticeship and diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Italy. Surg Endosc 9: 46–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olinger A, Pistorius G, Lindemann W, Vollmar B, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD (1999) Effectiveness of a hands-on training course for laparoscopic spine surgery in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 13: 118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ooi LL (1996) Training in laparoscopic surgery: have we got it right yet? Ann Acad Med Singapore 25: 732–736

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oria HE, Brolin RE (1999) Performance standards in bariatric surgery. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 77–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rattner DW, Apelgren KN, Eubanks WS (2001) The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 15: 1066–1077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers D, Elstein A, Bordage G (2001). Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg 233: 159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1998) Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 1333: 657–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, Fullum TM, Lisehora GB, Rosser IE, Barcia PJ, Savalgi RS (1997) Telementoring: a practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc 11: 852–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Royston CM, Lansdown MR, Brough WA (1994) Teaching laparoscopic surgery: the need for guidelines. Br Med J 308: 1023–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W (2002, December 4) The learning curve for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8857-z

    Google Scholar 

  21. See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ (1993). Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery. JAMA 270: 2689–2692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stone MD, Doyle J (1996) The influence of surgical training on the practice of surgery: are changes necessary? Surg Clin North Am 76: 1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tompkins RK (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: threat or opportunity? Arch Surg 125: 1245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfe BM, Szabo Z, Morgan ME, Chan P, Hunter JG (1993) Training for minimally invasive surgery: need for surgical skills. Surg Endosc 7: 93–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zucker KA, Bailey RW, Graham MD, Scovil MD, Imbembo AL (1993) Training for laparoscopic surgery. World J Surg 17: 3–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the following surgeons for their participation in the training of the 300 course participants: Robert Brolin, MD (Piscataway, NJ), J. K. Champion, MD (Atlanta, GA), Ricardo Cohen, MD (Hospital Sao Camilo, Brazil), Juan Antonio Lopez Corvala, MD (Tijuana, Mexico), Eric DeMaria, MD (Richmond, Va), Ed Felix, MD (San Francisco, CA), Michel Gagner, MD (New York, NY), Kelvin Higa, MD (Fresno, CA), Sayeed Ikramuddin, MD (Minneapolis, MN), Dan Jones, MD (Boston, MA), Kenneth MacDonald, MD (Greenville, NC), Ninh Nguyen, MD (Sacramento, CA), Paul O’Brien, MD (Melbourne, Australia), Walter Pories, MD (Greenville, NC), Michael Sarr, MD (Rochester, MN), Bruce Schirmer MD, (Charlottesville, VA), J. Stephen Scott, MD (Wentzville, MO), Scott Shikora, MD (Boston, MA), Harvey Sugerman, MD (Richmond, VA), and Bruce Wolfe, MD (Sacramento, CA). In addition the authors thank William Gourash, CRNP (Pittsburgh, PA) for course oversight, and the contributions of U.S. Surgical (Norwalk, CT) for educational grant support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. R. Schauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lord, J.L., Cottam, D.R., Dallal, R.M. et al. The impact of laparoscopic bariatric workshops on the practice patterns of surgeons. Surg Endosc 20, 929–933 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0182-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0182-x

Keywords

Navigation