Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a problem of hiatal closure more than a problem of the wrap

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery usually is transient and resolves within weeks after surgery. Persistent dysphagia develops in a small percentage of patients after surgery. There still is debate about whether postoperative dysphagia is caused by the type or placement of the fundic wrap or by mechanical obstruction of the hiatal crura. This study aimed to investigate patients who experienced recurrent or persistent dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery, and to identify the morphologic reason for this complication.

Methods

A sample of 50 patients consecutively referred to the authors’ unit with recurrent, persistent, or new-onset of dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery were prospectively reviewed to identify the morphologic cause of postoperative dysphagia. According to their radiologic findings, these patients were divided into three groups: patients with signs of obstruction at or above the gastroesophageal junction suspicious of crural stenosis (group A; n = 18), patients with signs of total or partial migration of the wrap intrathoracically (group B; n = 27), and patients in whom the hiatal closure was radiologically assessed to be correct with a supposed stenosis of the wrap (group C; n = 5). The exact diagnosis of a too tight (group A) or too loose (group B) hiatus in contrast to a too tight wrap (group C) was established during laparoscopic redo surgery (groups B and C) or by x-ray during pneumatic dilation (group A).

Results

For all 18 group A patients, intraoperative x-ray during pneumatic dilation showed the typical signs of hiatal tightness. Of these, 15 were free of symptoms after dilation, and 3 had to undergo laparoscopic redo surgery because of persistent dysphagia. In all these patients, the hiatal closure was narrowing the esophagus. All the group B patients underwent laparoscopic redo surgery because of intrathoracic wrap migration. Intraoperatively, all the patients had an intact fundoplication, which slipped above the diaphragm. Definitely, only in 10% of all 50 patients (group C) presenting with the symptom of dysphagia, was the morphologic reason for the obstruction a problem of the fundic wrap.

Conclusions

In most patients, postoperative dysphagia is more a problem of hiatal closure than a problem of the fundic wrap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud JP, Pessaux P, Ghavami B, Flament JB, Trebuchet G, Meyer C, Hutten N, Champault G (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesphageal reflux: multicenter study of 1,470 cases. Chirurgie 124: 516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalenbäck J, Lonroth H, Blomqvist A, Lundell L (1999) Improved functional outcome after laparoscopic fundoplication by complete gastric fundus mobilization. Gastroenterology 114: A1384

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devitt PG, Watson DI, Kennedy A, Game PA, Jamieson GG (1999) Posterior versus anterior hiatal repair during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Surg 69: 57–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunnigton GL, DeMeester TR (1993) Outcome effect of adherence to operative principles of Nissen fundoplication by multiple surgeons. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group. Am J Surg 166: 654–657

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fibbe C, Layer P, Keller J, Strate U, Emmermann A, Zornig C (2001) Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, clinical, and manometric study. Gastroenterology 121: 5–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs KH, Feussner H, Bonavina L, Collard JM, Coosemans W (1997) Current status and trends in laparoscopic antireflux surgery: results of a consensus meeting. Endoscopy 29: 298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pasiut M, Haas CF, Wykypiel Jr H, Pointner R (2002) Is laparoscopic refundoplication feasible in patients with failed primary open antireflux surgery? Surg Endosc 16: 381–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pasiut M, Haas CF, Wykypiel Jr H, Pointner R (2002) Long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery: surgical outcome and analysis of failure after 500 laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Surg Endosc 16: 753–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2002) Quality of life, surgical outcome, and patients’ satisfaction three years after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. World J Surg 26:1234–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2003) Laparoscopic refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 138: 902–907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T Pasiut M, Haas CF, Pointner R (2002) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery with routine mesh hiatoplasty in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 347–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, Neary P, DeMeester TR, Perdikis G (1994) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 220: 472–4837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D, Eubanks T, Pellegrini C (1999) Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 134: 809–817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD, Waring JP, Trus TL, Cornwall M, Galloway K (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 230: 595–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter JG, Swanstrom L, Waring JP (1995) Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: the impact of operative technique. Ann Surg 224: 51–57

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson J, Peters JH (1999) Preoperative evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Acta Chir. Austriaca 31: 338–345

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamolz T, Bammer T, Pointner R (2000) Predictability of dysphagia after laparoscopic nissen fundoplication. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 408–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Heimbucher J, Ireland AP, Bremner CG (1995) A tailored approach to antireflux surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110: 141–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lafullarde T, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Game PA, Devitt PG (2001) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: five-year result and beyond. Arch Surg 136: 180–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lundell L, Abrahamsson H, Ruth M, Pydberg L, Lonroth H, Olbe L (1999) Long-term results of a prospective randomized comparison of total fundic warp (Nissen–Rosetti) or semifundoplication (Toupet) for gastroesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 86: 405–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McKernan JB, Champion JK (1998) Minimally invasive antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 175: 271–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rydberg L, Ruth M, Abrahamsson H, Lundell L (1999) Tailoring antireflux surgery: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 23: 612–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Soper NJ, Dunnegan D (1999) Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 229: 669–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Terry M, Smith CD, Branum GD, Galloway K, Waring JP, Hunter JG (2001) Outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 15: 691–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG, Mitchell PC, Game PA (1995) Paraesophageal hiatus hernia: an important complication of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 82: 521–523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wetscher GJ, Glaser K, Wieschemeyer T, Gadenstätter M (1997) Tailored antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: effectiveness and risk of postoperative dysphagia. World J Surg 21: 605–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wills VL, Hunt DR (2001) Dysphagia after antireflux surgery . Br J Surg 88: 486–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu JS, Dunnegan DL, Luttman DR, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of surgical technique on clinical outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 10: 1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, 72076, Germany

    F. A. Granderath

  2. Department of General Surgery and Division of Clinical Psychology, General Hospital Zell am See, Zell am See, A-5700, Austria

    U. M. Schweiger, T. Kamolz & R. Pointner

Authors
  1. F. A. Granderath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. M. Schweiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Kamolz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Pointner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granderath, F.A., Schweiger, U.M., Kamolz, T. et al. Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery: a problem of hiatal closure more than a problem of the wrap. Surg Endosc 19, 1439–1446 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0034-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0034-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation