Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: A population-based study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Despite being controversial in the past, many reports on the safe use of laparoscopic surgery in emergency settings have been published. The aim of this study was to investigate the diffusion of laparoscopic surgery in three common surgical emergency operations, namely, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and simple repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), in a stable population.

Methods:

This was a retrospective analysis of the central database of the Hospital Authority (HA) in Hong Kong. Data for patients managed in 14 HA hospitals from 1998 to 2002 were studied. The operation record and discharge record of each patient were also investigated to verify the data.

Results:

A total of 12,708 patients underwent appendectomy, 2631 patients underwent cholecystectomy, and 2260 patients had simple repair of PPU performed. During the study period, 37.2% of appendectomies, 46.5% of cholecystectomies, and 23.1% of simple repairs of PPU were performed laparoscopically. More than a two-fold increase in the proportion of laparoscopic surgery was observed in each of these three operations. By the end of 2002, the percentage of laparoscopic surgery had increased to 53.5% for appendectomies, 61.3% for cholecystectomies, and 32.9% for simple repairs of PPU. Significantly lower hospital mortality rates and shorter postoperative hospital stay were consistenty observed in patients with laparoscopic surgery of the three emergencies. A wide variation in the use of laparoscopic surgery, ranging from 3.7% to 73.1%, was observed among the 14 HA hospitals. However, there was no correlation in the use of laparoscopic surgery with the volume of operation performed in each hospital (p = 0.933).

Conclusion:

A high diffusion rate on the use of laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergency was observed in Hong Kong. However, there was also a wide variation in the diffusion rate among the 14 HA hospitals. Efforts to reduce hospital variation for the better dissemination of safe laparoscopic technique may be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Agresta P Simone ParticleDe L Leone A Arezzo A Biondi L Bottero F Catena G Conzo G Genio ParticleDel A Fersini M Guerrieri G Illomei P Tonelli M Vitellaro G Docimo A Crucitti InstitutionalAuthorNameItalian Society of Young Surgeons (SPIGC) (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendectomy in Italy: an appraisal of 26,863 cases J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14 1–8 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109264204322862270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. RJ Baigrie TC Dehn SM Fowler DC Dunn (1995) ArticleTitleAnalysis of 8651 appendicectomies in England and Wales during 1992 Br J Surg 82 933 Occurrence Handle7648113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Baker (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendicectomy—a trainee’s experience N Z Med J 112 208–211 Occurrence Handle10414622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JS Bender MD Duncan PD Freeswick JW Harmon TH Magnuson (2002) ArticleTitleIncreased laparoscopic experience does not lead to improved results with acute cholecystitis Am J Surg 184 591–594 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01089-9 Occurrence Handle12488180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CD Dirksen AJ Ament PM Go (1996) ArticleTitleDiffusion of six surgical endoscopic procedures in The Netherlands. Stimulating and restraining factors Health Policy 37 91–104 Occurrence Handle10172857

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ML Druart R Hee ParticleVan J Etienne GB Cadiere JF Gigot M Legrand JM Limbosch B Navez M Tugilimana E Vyve ParticleVan L Vereecken E Wibin JP Yvergneaux (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial Surg Endosc 11 1017–1020 Occurrence Handle9381340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. SE Duff AR Dixon (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendicectomy: safe and useful for training Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82 388–391 Occurrence Handle11103154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JJ Escarce BS Bloom AL Hillman JA Shea JS Schwartz (1995) ArticleTitleDiffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in United States Med Care 33 256–271 Occurrence Handle7861828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. U Guller S Hervey H Purves LH Muhlbaier ED Peterson S Eubanks R Pietrobon (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database Ann Surg 239 43–52 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1 Occurrence Handle14685099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hospital Authority (2003) Hospital Authority Statistical Report 2001–2002

  11. J Koo YK Ngan SK Lam (1983) ArticleTitleTrends in hospital admission, perforation and mortality of peptic ulcer in Hong Kong from 1970 to 1980 Gastroenterology 84 1558–1562 Occurrence Handle6840485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. PB Lai KH Kwong KL Leung SP Kwok AC Chan SC Chung WY Lau (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 85 764–767 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x Occurrence Handle9667702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WY Lau KL Leung KH Kwong IC Davey C Robertson JJ Dawson SC Chung AK Li (1996) ArticleTitleA randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique Ann Surg 224 131–138 Occurrence Handle8757375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. WS Laycock AE Siewers CM Birkmeyer DE Wennberg JD Birkmeyer (2000) ArticleTitleVariation in the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients with acute cholecystitis Arch Surg 135 457–462 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.4.457 Occurrence Handle10768712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. CM Lo CL Liu ST Fan EC Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 227 461–467 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001 Occurrence Handle9563529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D Menon D Marshall (1994) ArticleTitleDiffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Canada Int J Tech Assess Health Care 10 287–292

    Google Scholar 

  17. P Mouret Y Francois J Vignal X Barth R Lombard-Platet (1990) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer Br J Surg 77 1006 Occurrence Handle2145052

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. LK Nathanson DW Easter A Cuschieri (1990) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer Surg Endosc 4 232–233 Occurrence Handle2149782

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. H Noble P Gallagher WB Campbell (2003) ArticleTitleWho is doing laparoscopic appendicectomies and who taught them? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 331–333 Occurrence Handle10.1308/003588403769162459 Occurrence Handle14594538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. PB Poulsen S Adamsen H Vondeling T Jorgensen (1998) ArticleTitleDiffusion of laparoscopic technologies in Denmark Health Policy 45 149–167 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00036-0 Occurrence Handle10186225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. WT Siu CH Chau BK Law CN Tang PY Ha MK Li (2004) ArticleTitleRoutine use of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer Br J Surg 91 481–484 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4452 Occurrence Handle15048752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. WT Siu HT Leong BK Law CH Chau AC Li KH Fung YP Tai MK Li (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 235 313–319 Occurrence Handle11882751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. JJ Tate JW Dawson SC Chung WY Lau AK Li (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial Lancet 342 633–637 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(93)91757-D Occurrence Handle8103144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Sun C.Y. Research Foundation for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery of the University of Hong Kong. We thank Ms Irene Chan, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, for editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Surgical Audit Unit, Central Coordinating Committee of Surgery, Hospital Authority, Hospital Authority Building, 147B Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    C. M. Lam, A. W. Yuen & A. C. Wai

  2. Centre for the Study of Liver Disease and Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    C. M. Lam, B. Chik & S. T. Fan

Authors
  1. C. M. Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. W. Yuen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Chik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. C. Wai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. T. Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Lam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, C.M., Yuen, A.W., Chik, B. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: A population-based study. Surg Endosc 19, 774–779 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9158-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9158-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation