Skip to main content
Log in

The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although rare, graft ischemia and necrosis after esophagectomy is a devastating complication. The aim of this study was to review our experience with early endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis after esophagectomy and reconstruction.

Methods

From a population of 479 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 1996–2003, we identified 102 patients who had endoscopy within 21 days of operation.

Results

Endoscopy was performed a median of 9 days after operation. Graft ischemia, anastomotic leak, or both were found in 63 of the 102 patients. Reoperation was necessary in 27% of these patients, including graft removal in nine patients. In 39 patients, endoscopy demonstrated a healthy graft; only one of these patients (2.6%) required reoperation. No patient with ischemia judged insufficient to warrant graft removal on initial endoscopy subsequently lost their graft. There were no complications or anastomotic injuries associated with early endoscopy.

Conclusion

Endoscopy early after esophagectomy is safe and provides accurate and reliable identification of graft ischemia that can be used to guide the treatment of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N Boyle A Pearce D Hunter W Owen R Mason (1999) ArticleTitleIntraoperative scanning laser Doppler flowmetry in the assessment of gastric tube perfusion during esophageal resection J Am Coll Surg 188 498–502 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00016-2 Occurrence Handle10235577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P Davis S Law J Wong (2003) ArticleTitleColonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer Arch Surg 138 303–308 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.3.303 Occurrence Handle12611579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J Urschel (1995) ArticleTitleEsophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review Am J Surg 169 634–640 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80238-4 Occurrence Handle7771633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J Briel AP Tamhankar JA Hagen SR DeMeester J Johansson E Choustoulakis JH Peters CG Bremner TR DeMeester (2004) ArticleTitlePrevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up vs colon interposition J Am Coll Surg 198 536–541 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.026 Occurrence Handle15051003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. R. DeMeester.

Additional information

Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeions (SAGES), Denver, CO, USA, March 31–4 April 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maish, M.S., DeMeester, S.R., Choustoulakis, E. et al. The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19, 1093–1102 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8816-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8816-y

Keywords

Navigation