Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive and local treatment for mucosal early gastric cancer

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

Early gastric cancer (EGC) can present an indication for local resection procedures under pertain circumstances. Especially endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs) and laparoscopic resections or those combined with endoscopy have been made possible in recent years.

Methods:

From 1996 to 2004, of a total of 425 patients with gastric cancer, 58 patients with EGC (13.6%) were prospectively analyzed and observed. Of these, 35 patients had preoperatively diagnosed submucosal infiltration and subsequently underwent gastrectomy and standard lymphnodectomy. Of the 23 patients with intramucosal EGC, 22 underwent local resection. One patient displayed lymph node and liver metastasis at the time of diagnosis and received chemotherapy following staging laparoscopy.

Results:

Among the 23 patients with intramucosal EGC, 13 were female and 10 male. The average age of the patients was 77.4 years (range: 69–86). The rate of lymph node metastasis was 12.5% (n = 35) for submucosal EGC and 4.3% (n = 23) for intramucosal EGC. Twenty-two patients with intramucosal EGC underwent local resection (four EMR, six laparoscopic intragastric resection, 12 laparoscopic wedge resection). The average tumor size was 1.2 cm (range 0.3–2.3). The definitive histological findings yielded in all patients tumor-free resection margins without venous or lymphangic infiltration. In 10 of 18 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection a simultaneous sentinel lymph node sampling (4 ± 3 LN) was performed. There were no metastases detected. Method-specific complications did not occur. The morbidity of this patient group was 13.6% (three of 22). Mortality was zero. The average postoperative hospital stay was 6.5 days (range 2–12). In the median follow-up of 30.3 months (range 1–86) no recurrences have yet been diagnosed. Four patients died within the observation period of non-cancer–related causes.

Conclusions:

Minimally invasive local resection of intramucosal EGC represents a favorable option when strict determination of indication has taken place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe N, Sugiyama M, Masaki T, Ueki H, Yanagida O, Moril T, Watanabe T, Atomi Y (2004) Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis of differentiated submucosally invasive gastric cancer Gastrointest Endosc 60: 242–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2002) Modern treatment of early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese experience Dig Surg 19: 333–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avital S, Braseco O, Szomstein S, Liberman M, Rosenthal R (2003) Technical considerations in laparoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms Surg Endosc 17: 763–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Basili G, Nesi G, Barchielli A, Manetti A, Biliotti G (2003) Pathologic features and long-term results in early gastric cancer: report of 116 cases 8–13 years after surgery World J Surg 27: 149–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Custureri F, D’Orazi V, Paparini N, Gabatel R, Urciuoli P, Patrizi G, Redler A, Di Matteo G (2004) Choice of the surgical treatment in early gastric cancer Hepatogastroenterology 51: 1210–1214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gotoda T, Yanagiswaw A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Kato Y (2000) Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers Gastric Cancer 3: 219–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiki Y, Sakuramato S, Katada N, Shimano H (2000) Kombiniertes laparoskopisch-endoskopisches Vorgehen beim Magenkarzinom Chirurg 71: 1193–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kikuchi S, Katada N, Sakuramato S, Kobayashi N, Shimao H, Watanabe M, Hiki Y (2004) Survival after surgical treatment of early gastric cancer: surgical techniques and long term survival Langenbecks Arch Surg 389: 69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim DY, Joo JK, Ryu SY, Kim YJ, Kim SK (2004) Factors related to lymph node metastasis and surgical strategy used to treat early gastric carcinoma World J Gastroenterol 10: 737–740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi T, Kazui T, Kimura T (2003) Surgical local resection for early gastric cancer Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13: 299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ludwig K, Weiner R, Bernhardt J (2003) Minimal-invasive Resektion von Magentumoren Chirurg 74: 632–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ludwig K, Wilhelm L, Scharlau U, Amtsberg G, Bernhardt J (2002) Laparoscopic–endoscopic combined resection of gastric tumours Surg Endosc 16: 1561–1565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto Y, Yanai H, Tokiyama H, Nishiaki M, Higaki S, Okita K (2000) Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of submucosal invasion in early gastric cancer J Gastroenterol 35: 326–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakagoe T, Tanaka K, Yasutake T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Nanashima A, Shibasaki SI, Yamaguchi H, Ayabe H (2003) Long-term outcomes of intragastric endoscopic mucosal resection using a modified Buess technique for early gastric cancer Dig Surg 20: 141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohashi S, Segava K, Okamura S, Mitake M, Urano H, Shimodaira M, Takeda T, Kanamori S, Naito T, Takeda K, Itih B, Goto H, Niwa Y, Hayakawa T (1999) The utility of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in the endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer Gut 45: 599–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohgami M, Otani Y, Kumai K, Kubota T, Kim Y, Kitajima M (1999) Curative laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer: five years experience World J Surg 23: 187–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotada T, Shizao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosohara K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer Gut 48: 225–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rösch T, Kapfer B, Will U, Baronius W, Strobel M, Lorenz R, Ulm K (2002) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective multicenter study Scand J Gastroenterol 7: 856–862

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seto Y, Yamaguchi H, Shimoyama S, Shimizu N, Aoki F, Kaminishi M (2001) Results of local resection with regional lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer Am J Surg 182: 498–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Willis S, Truong S, Gribnitz S, Fass J, Schumpelick V (2000) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer Surg Endosc 14: 951–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yanai H, Noguchi T, Mizumachi S, Tokiyama H, Nakamura H, Tada M, Okita K (1999) A blind comparison of the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in staging early gastric cancer Gut 44: 361–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yasuda K (2002) EUS in the detection of early gastric cancer Gastrointest Endosc 56(suppl 4): S68–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ludwig.

Additional information

Presented at the 12th International Congress, of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Barcelona, Spain, 9–12 June 2004.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, K., Klautke, G., Bernhard, J. et al. Minimally invasive and local treatment for mucosal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19, 1362–1366 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2249-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2249-5

Keywords:

Navigation