Abstract
Background:
A variety of alloplastic materials are used for hernia repair. We discuss the long-term stability and possible shrinkage of these materials. In the past, measurement of pore sizes was used to study the physical properties of alloplastic meshes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement of pore sizes with regard to its correlation to possible mesh alteration.
Methods:
The water absorption of different polypropylene (PP) and polyester (PE) mesh materials under defined conditions was studied. For shrinkage studies, meshes were stored in formaldehyde, distilled water, saline solution, trypsin solution, urea solution, and hydrogen peroxide. The measurement of the relation between material and pore was evaluated to investigate the potential shrinking and enlargement processes. This material–pore index (MPI) before as well as 1, 7, and 14 days after incubation was measured.
Results:
In comparison to measuring single pore sizes, MPI determination is the more efficient method to evaluate the possible shrinking or enlargement processes of alloplastic materials. With this technique, incorrect determination of pore sizes due to the dynamic textile structure of meshes and to shrinkage or enlargement, is excluded. All tested alloplastic materials showed an insignificant increase in water absorption under the condition of rehydration up to 0.4%. We did not observe variances in the material in shrinking or enlargement.
Conclusions:
MPI was found to be more reliable than measuring single pores to investigate possible external influences on polymer materials. Biomaterials such as PP and PE proved to be absolutely inert under various in vitro conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amid PK, (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery Hernia 1: 15–21
Amid PK, (2000) Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula Br J Surg 87: 1436–1437
Amid PK, (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty Hernia 7: 13–16
Anwar S, (2003) The use of prosthetics in hernia repair Hosp Med 64: 34–35
Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Hadchity Y (1999) Surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft: a report on 250 cases Arch Surg 134: 1260–1262
Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults Br J Surg 88: 1321–1323
Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Surgical treatment of incisional hernia Br J Surg 89: 534–545
Coda A, Bendavid R, Botto-Micca F, Bossotti M, Bona A (2003) Structural alterations of prosthetic meshes in humans Hernia 7: 29–34
DeBord JR, (1998) The historical development of prosthetics in hernia surgery Surg Clin North Am 78: 973–1006
Durden JG, Pemberton LB (1974) Dacron mesh in ventral and inguinal hernia repair Am Surg 60: 662–665
Ghadimi BM, Langer C, Becker H (2002) The carcinogenic potential of biomaterials in hernia surgery Chirurg 73: 833–837
Grant AM, (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data Hernia 6: 130–136
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs Eur J Surg 164: 965–969
Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Hermanns B, Schumpelick V (2000) Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans Chirurg 71: 43–51
LeBlanc KA, (2001) Complications associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorrhaphy Hernia 5: 135–138
Sher W, Pollack D, Paulides CA, Matsumoto T (1980) Repair of abdominfal wall defects: Gore-Tex vs Marlex graft. Am Surg 46: 618–623
Usher FC, Alien JE, Crosthwait RW (1962) Polypropylene monofilament; a new biologically inert suture for closing contaminated wounds J Am Med Assoc 79: 780–786
Witherspoon P, Bryson G, Wright DM, Reid R, O’Dwyer PJ (2004) Carcinogenic potential of commonly used hernia repair prostheses in an experimental model Br J Surg 91: 368–372
Wulfhorst B (1989) Polypropylene fibres Chemiefaser/Textilindustrie 39: 3–11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapischke, M., Prinz, K., Tepel, J. et al. Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology. Surg Endosc 19, 1260–1265 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2235-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2235-y