Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic removal of large sessile polyps is sometimes technically difficult and is associated with an increased risk of complications. Moreover, the incidence of invasive carcinoma within these polyps is not negligible. Laparoscopic colorectal resection has been recommended in the treatment of these large polyps. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps that were not suitable for colonoscopic removal.

Methods

Forty-five patients (28 men and 17 women) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal polyps were analyzed. The reasons for surgical resection were large sessile polyps (n = 34), difficult position (n = 2), recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 1), and the presence of intramucosal malignancy on histology after colonoscopic polypectomy (n = 8).

Results

The mean age of the patients was 66.7 years (range, 33–89). Previous abdominal operation had been performed in 12 patients (26.7%). Two patients underwent subtotal colectomy because of multiple polyps (14 and 19, respectively). Synchronous resection of other organs was performed in two patients (a right salpingo-oophorectomy and a right adrenalectomy). Intraoperative complications occurred in two patients, and two patients (4.5%) required conversion because of perforation of the colon during dissection and dense adhesions, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications occurred in seven patients (15.6%), and they included postoperative ileus (n = 4), anastomotic leakage (n = 1), urinary retention (n = 1), and urinary tract infection (n = 1). Reoperation was required in one patient for anastomotic leakage. The median hospital stay was 6 days. The histopathology of colorectal polyps showed tubular (n = 12), tubulovillous (n = 13), and villous adenoma (n = 12); mixed adenomatous/hyperolastic polyps (n = 2); inflammatory polyp (n = 1); and colonic lipoma (n = 1). Four patients, who had previous polypectoray with intramucosal malignancy, had no residual pathology. The median size was 3.0 cm. Invasive carcinoma was found in 16 patients (35.6%). The median number of lymph node sampling was six, and two patients had lymph node metastases.

Conclusions

Colonic polyps that were not amendable for colonoscopic removal were associated with a high incidence of malignant invasion. Laparoscopic colectomy offers safe and effective management of these polyps with the benefits of early postoperative recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (1988) The role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with colonic polyps. Guidelines for clinical application. Gastrointest Endosc 34: 6S–7S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck DE, Margolin DA (2004) Laparoscopic treatment of colonic polyps. Semin Laparosc Surg 11: 23–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman AE, Levitt MD, Hewett P, Woods R, Sheiner H, Maddern GJ (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg 234: 590–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Church JM (2003) Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1513–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Church JM (2003) Experience in the endoscopic management of large colonic polyps. ANZ J Surg 73: 988–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dell’Abate P, losca A, Galimberti A, Piccolo P, Soliani P, Foggi E (2001) Endoscopic treatment of colorectal benign-appearing lesions 3 cm or larger: techniques and outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doniec JM, Lohnert MS, Schniewind B, Bokelmann F, Kremer B, Grimm H (2003) Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 46: 340–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eijsbouts QA, Heuff G, Sietses C, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (1999) Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colonic polyps. Br J Surg 86: 505–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin ME Jr, Diaz-E JA, Abrego D, Parra-Davila E, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1246–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Joo JS, Amarnath L, Wexner SD (1998) Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial? Surg Endosc 12:1341–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald JM, Moonka R, Bell RH Jr (1999) Pathologic risk factors of occult malignancy in endoscopically unresectable colonic adenomas. Am J Surg 177: 384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Molenaar C, Bijen AB, de Ruiter P (1998) Indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Results from the Medical Centre Almaar, The Netherlands. Surg Endosc 12: 42–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nivatvongs S (1988) Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps. Am Surg 54: 61–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Groitl H, Wittekind C, Hahn EG (1997) Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis 12: 267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prohm P, Weber J, Bonner C (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted coloscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 746–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sands LR, Wexner SD (1996) The role of laparoscopic colectomy and laparotomy with resection in the management of complex polyps of the colon. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 5: 713–721

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Waye JD, et al. (1990) Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ 68: 789–795

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. (1993) The National Polyp Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2 (suppl 2): 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  21. Young-Fadok TM, Radice E, Nelson H, Harmsen WS (2000) Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a case-matched series. Mayo Clinic Proc75: 344–348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Law.

Additional information

Paper presented at the 19th World Congress of Digestive Surgery, the biennial scientific meeting of the International Society for Digestive Surgery, Yokohama, Japan, December 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lo, S.H., Law, W.L. Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal. Surg Endosc 19, 1252–1255 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2220-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2220-4

Keywords

Navigation