Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: Construct and concurrent validity

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The assessment of technical skills should provide objective feedback and judge suitability of progress during training. The aim of this study was to validate two objective assessment techniques for laparoscopic suturing and demonstrate a correlation between them.

Methods

Six experts, seven surgeons skilled in laparoscopic suturing, and 13 with no laparoscopic suturing skills were asked to place two or three intracorporeal sutures on a synthetic suture pad. The latter group was given video-based instructions prior to the execution of the sutures. Ergonomic conditions were standardized for all subjects. The procedures were recorded on videotape and two blinded observers rated the first suture of each subject on a 29-point checklist. A motion analysis system, Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device, was used to assess psychomotor skills.

Results

There was a significant difference in the time taken (p = 0.000) and total path length (p = 0.000) per suture across the groups. There were also a significant difference in the total checklist score (p = 0.000) and its individual categories. The was a strong correlation between the total path length and the total checklist score (coefficient, 0.78; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

A combination of the motion analysis system and the checklist would make the process of formative feedback during the learning of intracorporeal suturing objective and comprehensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B Cagir M Rangraj L Maffuci BL Herz (1994) ArticleTitleThe learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Laparoendosc Surg 4 419–427 Occurrence Handle7881146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JY Chung JM Sackier (1998) ArticleTitleA method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills Surg Endosc 12 1111–1116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900795 Occurrence Handle9716762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Cuschieri N Francis J Crosby GB Hanna (2001) ArticleTitleWhat do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 182 110–116 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00667-5 Occurrence Handle11574079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DJ Deziel KW Millikan SG Economou A Doolas ST Ko MC Airan (1993) ArticleTitleComplications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases Am J Surg 165 9–14 Occurrence Handle8418705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TR Eubanks RH Clements D Pohl N Williams DC Schaad S Horgan et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Am Coll Surg 189 566–574 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00218-5 Occurrence Handle10589593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JW Fleshman RD Fry EH Birnbaum IJ Kodner (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted and minilaparotomy approaches to colorectal diseases are similar in early outcome Dis Colon Rectum 39 15–22 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02048262 Occurrence Handle8601351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. AG Gallagher RM Satava (2002) ArticleTitleVirtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures Surg Endosc 16 1746–1752 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8215-6 Occurrence Handle12140641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JA Kopta (1971) ArticleTitleAn approach to the evaluation of operative skills Surgery 70 297–303 Occurrence Handle5560189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M Lekawa SJ Shapiro LA Gordon J Rothbart JR Hiatt (1995) ArticleTitleThe laparoscopic learning curve Surg Laparosc Endosc 5 455–458 Occurrence Handle8611992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T Mori N Hatano S Maruyama Y Atomi (1998) ArticleTitleSignificance of “hands-on training” in laparoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 12 256–260 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900646 Occurrence Handle9502707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JH Peters EC Ellison JT Innes JL Liss KE Nichols JM Lomano et al. (1991) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients Ann Surg 213 3–12 Occurrence Handle1824674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. G Regehr H MacRae RK Reznick D Szalay (1998) ArticleTitleComparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination Acad Med 73 993–997 Occurrence Handle9759104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. RK Reznick (1993) ArticleTitleTeaching and testing technical skills Am J Surg 165 358–361 Occurrence Handle8447543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. JC Rosser LE Rosser RS Savalgi (1997) ArticleTitleSkill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery Arch Surg 132 200–204 Occurrence Handle9041927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JC Rosser SuffixJr LE Rosser RS Savalgi (1998) ArticleTitleObjective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons Arch Surg 133 657–661 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.6.657 Occurrence Handle9637467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. CM Royston MR Lansdown WA Brough (1994) ArticleTitleTeaching laparoscopic surgery: the need for guidelines Br Med J 308 1023–1025

    Google Scholar 

  17. AJ Simons GJ Anthone AE Ortega M Franklin J Fleshman WP Geis et al. (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve Dis Colon Rectum 38 600–603 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054118 Occurrence Handle7774470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CD Smith TM Farrell SS McNatt RE Metreveli (2001) ArticleTitleAssessing laparoscopic manipulative skills Am J Surg 181 547–550 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00639-0 Occurrence Handle11513783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SG Smith J Torkington TJ Brown NJ Taffinder A Darzi (2002) ArticleTitleMotion analysis Surg Endosc 16 640–645 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080081 Occurrence Handle11972205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. FC Spencer FC Spencer (1978) ArticleTitleTeaching and measuring surgical techniques—the technical evaluation of competence Bull Am Coll Surgeons 63 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. N Taffinder S Smith J Mair R Russell A Darzi (1999) ArticleTitleCan a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD Surg Endosc 13 IssueIDsuppl 1 81

    Google Scholar 

  22. J Watts WB Feldman (1985) Assessment of technical skills VR Neufeld GR Norman (Eds) Assessing clinical competence Springer New York 259–274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College, St. Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor, QEQM Building, Praed Street, W2 1NY, London

    K. Moorthy, Y. Munz, A. Dosis, F. Bello, A. Chang & A. Darzi

Authors
  1. K. Moorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Munz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Dosis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Bello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Darzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Moorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Dosis, A. et al. Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: Construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18, 1608–1612 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9312-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9312-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation