Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In this multicenter study, we evaluated the efficiency of a specific ultrasound examination in detecting postoperative bowel adhesions and assessed the adhesion rate associated with the intraperitoneal use of Parietex composite mesh (polyester mesh covered on the visceral side by a hydrophilic resorbable film). Methods: Eighty patients (36 male, 44 female; average age, 58.2 years [ranges 30–80]) were included in a study carried out at eight centers. The main inclusion criterion was the surgical treatment of incisional and umbilical hernias using an intraperitoneal mesh. The results of a preoperative ultrasound examination were compared to a macroscopic perioperative exploration. In addition, in 76 of the 80 patients, a postoperative ultrasound examination was repeated at 2 and 12 months. Results: The ultrasound findings for peritoneal adhesion detection were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 74%; positive predictive value, 65%; negative predictive value, 84%; accuracy, 75%. Postoperative adhesions after 1 year were detected in 14% of patients. Conclusions: Although these patients had undergone repeated surgery and treated to be (obese) body mass index (mean, 28), the ultrasound exam had a high accuracy rate; when it was negative, there were no adhesions in 84% of cases. The use of a hydrophilic composite mesh is associated with a low rate of adhesions (14%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Alponat SR Lakshminarasappa M Teh A Rajnakova S Moochhala PM Goh ST Chan (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of physical barriers in prevention of adhesions: an incisional hernia model in rats. J Surg Res 68 126–132 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jsre.1996.4979 Occurrence Handle9184670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. PK Amid G Shulman L Lichtenstein S Sostrin J Young M Hakakha (1995) ArticleTitlePreliminary evaluation of composite materials for the repair of incisional hernias. Ann Chir 49 539–543 Occurrence Handle8526448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JP Arnaud C Cervi JJ Tuech F Cattan (1997) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment of post-operative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of a Dacron mesh. Hernia 1 97–99

    Google Scholar 

  4. JM Becker MT Dayton VW Fazio DE Beck SJ Strycker SD Wexner BG Wolff PL Roberts LE Smith M Moore RW Beart (1995) ArticleTitleSodium hyaluronate–based bioresorbable membrane (HAL-F) in the prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded multicentre study. Br J Surg 82 IssueIDSuppl 1 xx–xx

    Google Scholar 

  5. HJ Bonjer EJ Hazebroek G Kazemier MC Giuffrida WS Meijer JF Lange (1997) ArticleTitleOpen versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84 599–602 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3MrntlI%3D Occurrence Handle9171741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. G Borzellino G De Manzoni F Ricci (1998) ArticleTitleDetection of abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic surgery, a controlled study of 130 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 273–276 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199808000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czmvFahsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9703599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JA Caprini JA Arcelus J Swanson R Coats K Hoffman JJ Brosnan S Blattner (1995) ArticleTitleThe ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc 9 283–285 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA38%2FnsF0%3D Occurrence Handle7597599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. G Champault F Cazacu N Taffinder (1996) ArticleTitleSerious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6 367–370 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199610000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2crjs1I%3D Occurrence Handle8890421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. TS Desser R Brooke Jeffrey MJ Lane PW Ralls (1999) ArticleTitleTissue harmonic imaging: utility in abdominal and pelvic sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 27 135–141 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7mt1Wktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10064411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. GS Dizerega (1994) ArticleTitleContemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril 61 219–235

    Google Scholar 

  11. CD George H Ellis (1986) ArticleTitleThe results of incisional hernia repair: a twelve year review. Ann R Coll Surg 68 185–187 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiD2svlslU%3D Occurrence Handle3789602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. S Guerriero S Ajossa MP Lai V Mais AM Paoletti GB Melis (1997) ArticleTitleTransvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod 12 2649–2653 Occurrence Handle10.1093/humrep/12.12.2649 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hsFeltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9455829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. RD Harris SR Holtzman AM Poppe (2000) ArticleTitleClinical outcome in female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings. Radiology 216 440–443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgslSqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10924567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. JL Hill-West SM Chowdhury RC Dunn JA Hubbell (1994) ArticleTitleEfficacy of a resorbable hydrogel barrier, oxidized regenerated cellulose and hyaluronic acid in the prevention of ovarian adhesions in a rabbit model. Fertil Steril 62 630–634

    Google Scholar 

  15. DG Hutson E Russel J Yrizarry JU Levi AS Livingstone J Guerra (1998) ArticleTitlePercutaneous dilatation of biliary strictures through the afferent limb of a modified Roux-en-Y choledocojejunostomy or hepaticojejunostomy. Am J Surg 175 108–113 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00278-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7nsFantA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9515525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. C Kessler MA Jenett M Hoemann M Hau D Hann (1999) ArticleTitleConventional ultrasound and tissue harmonic imaging. Radiology 213 381

    Google Scholar 

  17. H Kitamura S Miwa T Nakata K Nomura T Tanaka T Ikegami S Miyagawa S Kawasaki (2000) ArticleTitleSonographic detection of visceral adhesion in percutaneous drainage of afferent-loop small-intestine obstruction. J Clin Ultrasound 28 133–136 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(200003/04)28:3<133::AID-JCU5>3.3.CO;2-A Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ksF2ntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10679700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. I Kodama LA Loiacono B Sigel J Machi RM Golub RE Parsons J Justin HA Zaren AK Sachdeva (1992) ArticleTitleUltrasonic detection of viscera slide as an indicator of abdominal wall adhesions. J Clin Ultrasound 20 375–380 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD3MnpvVI%3D Occurrence Handle1328308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. RV Kolecki RM Golub B Sigel J Machi H Kitamura T Hosokawa J Justin J Schwartz HA Zaren (1994) ArticleTitleAccuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound. Surg Endosc 8 871–874 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD1cvislQ%3D Occurrence Handle7992152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. KA Le Blanc WV Booth (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 39–41

    Google Scholar 

  21. F Marchal L Brunaud H Sebbag L Bresler JM Tortuyaux P Boissel (1999) ArticleTitleTreatment of incisional hernias by placement of an intraperitoneal prosthesis: a series of 128 patients. Hernia 3 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  22. G Marin S Bergama E Miola MW Caldironi G Dagnini (1987) ArticleTitlePrelaparoscopic echography used to detect abdominal adhesions. Endoscopy 19 147–149 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiA3cvgtlM%3D Occurrence Handle2957192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. D Mutter GT Rodeheaver P Diemunsch M Therin DL Moody M Raffaelli J Marescaux (1998) ArticleTitleA new composite mesh (collagen-polyester) for intra-abdominal laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 12 595

    Google Scholar 

  24. J Rives JC Pire JB Flament JP Palot (1987) Major incisional hernias. JP Chevrel (Eds) Surgery of the abdominal wall. Springer-Verlag New York 116–144

    Google Scholar 

  25. DM Rosen AM Lam M Chapman M Carlton GM Cario (1998) ArticleTitleMethods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv 53 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  26. B Sigel RM Golub LA Loiacono RE Parsons I Kodama J Machi J Justin AK Sachdeva HA Zaren (1991) ArticleTitleTechnique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc 5 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  27. R Stoppa D Louis P Verhaeghe X Henry JP Plachot (1987) ArticleTitleCurrent surgical treatment of postoperative eventrations. Int Surg 72 42–44 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB2cblsVI%3D Occurrence Handle2954925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. R Uberoi H D’Costa C Brown P Dubbins (1995) ArticleTitleVisceral slide for intraperitoneal adhesions? A prospective study in 48 patients with surgical correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 23 363–366 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqH3czmvF0%3D Occurrence Handle7673452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Y Yaacobi AA Israel EP Goldberg (1993) ArticleTitlePrevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by tissue precoating with polymer solutions. J Surg Res 55 422–426 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jsre.1993.1163 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3Mjnt1A%3D Occurrence Handle8412130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Arnaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubé, C., Pessaux, P., Tuech, J. et al. Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh. Surg Endosc 18, 131–135 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9056-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9056-2

Keywords

Navigation