Skip to main content
Log in

Time–motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Data on man–machine interfaces in the operation theater are essential to the improvement of surgical efficiency. This study analyzed the activity of the operating team during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical trainees.

Methods

The endoscopic image and overview of the operating room were recorded during 20 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by specialist residents. Time–motion analysis of the recorded tapes was performed.

Results

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) for theater time was 134 ± min (IQR, 52 min). The components of operative time for the surgeon were 26% for insertion of access ports and wound closure, 57% for intracorporeal endoscopic work, and 17% for instrument change. Only 52% of the scrub nurse time was related to the operation. Machine and video setup, adjustment of ancillary equipment together, and delivery of instruments and items requested by the surgeon and scrub nurse accounted for 13% of the circulating nurse time.

Conclusions

With the current nonergonomic theater design and structure, a significant proportion of theater time during routine uncomplicated laparoscopic surgery is used for nonoperative functions. The study highlights the need for improved ergonomic design, integrated bus operating systems under the control of the surgeon, and multifunctional laparoscopic instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V Bhatnager CG Drury SG Schiro (1985) ArticleTitlePosture, postural discomfort, and performance Hum Factors 27 189–199 Occurrence Handle4018811

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. GP Claus W Sjoerdsma A Jansen CA Grimbergen (1995) ArticleTitleQuantitative standardised analysis of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3 210–213 Occurrence Handle8846039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. KT Boer Particleden IH Straatsburg AV Schellinger LT Wit Particlede J Dankelman DJ Gouma (1999) ArticleTitleQuantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9 389–395 Occurrence Handle10522532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. GB Hanna S Shimi A Cuschieri (1997) ArticleTitleOptimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting Surg Endosc 11 397–401 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900374 Occurrence Handle9094288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. GB Hanna SM Shimi A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Lancet 351 248–251 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08005-7 Occurrence Handle9457094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. CM Haslegrave (1994) ArticleTitleWhat do we mean by a “working posture”? Ergonomics 37 781–799 Occurrence Handle8187755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. TA Kenyon MP Lenker TW Bax LL Swanstrom (1997) ArticleTitleCost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team: a comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team Surg Endosc 11 812–814 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900460 Occurrence Handle9266641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MH Liao CG Drury (2000) ArticleTitlePosture, discomfort, and performance in a VDT task Ergonomics 43 345–359 Occurrence Handle10.1080/001401300184459 Occurrence Handle10755658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. J Mallet (2001) ArticleTitleStudying man–machine interfaces in the operating room Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10 133–137 Occurrence Handle10.1080/136457001753192240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LK Nathanson S Shimi A Cuschieri (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique Br J Surg 78 155–159 Occurrence Handle1826623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JL Ponsky (1991) ArticleTitleComplications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 393–395 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90605-D Occurrence Handle1825765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. JA Shea MJ Healey JA Berlin JR Clarke PF Malet RN Staroscik JS Schwartz SV Williams (1996) ArticleTitleMortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis Ann Surg 224 609–620 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005 Occurrence Handle8916876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. NJ Soper PT Stockmann DL Dunnegan SW Ashley (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new “gold standard”? Arch Surg 127 917–921 Occurrence Handle1386505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. LW Traverso K Hargrave (1995) ArticleTitleA prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 169 503–506 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80205-0 Occurrence Handle7747829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank David Smith, consultant surgeon for recruiting his patients in the study, and the nursing staff in theater 6 for their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Cuschieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geryane, M.H., Hanna, G.B. & Cuschieri, A. Time–motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents. Surg Endosc 18, 1597–1600 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8210-1

Keywords

Navigation