Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The benefit of laparoscopy in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis continues to be controversial, particularly as it relates to operative time and costs. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 200 children who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis concurrently over 35 months at a large teaching children’s hospital. Results: Laparoscopic (n = 106) and open (n = 95) appendectomies were performed. The operative times and postoperative lengths of hospital stay were similar for the two groups. The mean total hospital cost for the laparoscopic group ($5,572) was significantly higher than for the open group ($4,472); (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Notably, the results show similar operative times for laparoscopic and open appendectomy. The cost of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is higher than for the open procedure. This study challenges health care providers to reduce costs and develop new ways to measure beneficial outcomes in a pediatric population that may reveal laparoscopic benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. TG Canty Sr D Collins B Losasso F Lynch C Brown (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice? [in-process citation]. J Pediatr Surg 35 1582–1585 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtF2isw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11083428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. RC Frazee JW Roberts RE Symmonds et al. (1994) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219 725–728 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB28zjtVA%3D Occurrence Handle8203983

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JB Hansen BM Smithers D Schache DR Wall BJ Miller BL Menzies (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20 17–20 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2cfjsVI%3D Occurrence Handle8588406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SA Hay (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 13 21–23 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003830050235 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FlsVeqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9391198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TJ Heikkinen K Haukipuro A Hulkko (1998) ArticleTitleCost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12 1204–1208 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900821 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvislSquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9745057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. A Hellberg C Rudberg E Kullman et al. (1999) ArticleTitleProspective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 8 48–53 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H Lintula H Kokki K Vanamo (2001) ArticleTitleSingle-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg 88 510–514 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01723.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3htVSiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11298617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. KH Long MP Bannon SP Zietlow et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129 390–400 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2001.114216 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3js1yqug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11283528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. LC Martin I Puente JL Sosa et al. (1995) ArticleTitleOpen versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222 256–261 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqH3cjpsF0%3D Occurrence Handle7677456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LE McCahill CA Pellegrini T Wiggins WS Helton (1996) ArticleTitleA clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy (see comments). Am J Surg 171 533–537 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB2crht1U%3D Occurrence Handle8651403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. AM Merhoff GC Merhoff ME Franklin (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 179 375–378 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00373-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitl2itg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10930483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. L Minne D Varner A Burnell E Ratzer J Clark W Haun (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132 708–711 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2svktVA%3D Occurrence Handle9230853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D Mutter M Vix A Bui et al. (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120 71–74 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3cbktFQ%3D Occurrence Handle8693426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DB Nguyen W Silen RA Hodin (1999) ArticleTitleAppendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras. J Gastrointest Surg 3 67–73

    Google Scholar 

  15. AE Ortega JG Hunter JH Peters LL Swanstrom B Schirmer (1995) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169 208–212 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80138-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC2c3jvVc%3D Occurrence Handle7840381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AG Pedersen OB Petersen P Wara H Ronning N Qvist S Laurberg (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88 200–205 Occurrence Handle11167866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O Reiertsen S Larsen E Trondsen B Edwin AE Faerden AR Rosseland (1997) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84 842–847 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3s3psVc%3D Occurrence Handle9189105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. K Semm (1983) ArticleTitleEndoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15 59–64 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB3cbks1Y%3D Occurrence Handle6221925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JJ Tate JW Dawson SC Chung WY Lau AK Li (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342 633–637 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(93)91757-D Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA28fivFc%3D Occurrence Handle8103144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Motomi Mori, PhD, for her expert statistical aid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. Vernon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernon, A., Georgeson, K. & Harmon, C. Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis . Surg Endosc 18, 75–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8868-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8868-9

Keywords

Navigation