Skip to main content
Log in

Role of routine intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic bariatric surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is a challenging procedure with a high risk of technical misadventures that may increase postoperative morbidity. Routine intraoperative endoscopy may reduce postoperative morbidity. This article reviews our 6-year experience. Methods: From April 1995 to September 2001, we performed 825 laparoscopic bariatric procedures: 743 roux gastric bypasses, 55 vertical banded gastroplasties, 18 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, and 9 gastric pacemakers. All the patients underwent flexible endoscopy by the primary surgeon at completion of the operation to assess for technical errors. Results: The 34 intraoperative technical errors (4.1%) identified included 29 suture and staple line leaks, 2 bougie perforations, 2 inadvertent stoma closures secondary to the suture line, and 1 mucosal perforation in a gastric pacemaker. All the errors were successfully repaired laparoscopically at the time of the procedure. Three leaks occurred postoperative (0.36%): 1 in the 34 repaired errors (2.9%) and 2 in the remaining 791 patients (0.25%). Conclusions: Routine intraoperative endoscopy identified 34 correctable technical errors in a series of 825 laparoscopic bariatric procedures. Of these, 33 (97%) were repaired successfully, which reduced postoperative morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Champion, J., Hunt, T. & DeLisle, N. Role of routine intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic bariatric surgery . Surg Endosc 16, 1663–1665 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8807-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8807-9

Keywords

Navigation