Skip to main content
Log in

Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was reported in 1990, it has met with widespread acceptance as a standard procedure using four trocars. The fourth (lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gallbladder so as to expose Calot’s triangle. It has been argued that the fourth trocar is not necessary in most cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the three-port vs the four-port technique. Methods: Between 1998 and 2000, 200 consecutive patients undergoing elective LC for gallstone disease were randomized to be treated via either the three- or four-port technique. Results: There was no difference between the two groups in age, sex, or weight. In terms of outcome, there was no difference between the two groups in success rate, operating time, number of oral analgesic tablets (paracetamol), visual analogue score, or postoperative hospital stay; however, the three-port group required fewer analgesic injections (nalbuphine) (0.4 vs 0.77, p = 0.024). Conclusion: The three-port technique is as safe as the standard four-port one for LC. The main advantages of the three-port technique are that it causes less pain, is less expensive, and leaves fewer scars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F Dubois P Icard G Berthelot H Levard (1990) ArticleTitleCoelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211 60–62 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC3czmt1E%3D Occurrence Handle2294845

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. PL Leggett R Churchman-Winn G Miller (2000) ArticleTitleMinimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. LK Nathanson S Shimi A Cushchieri (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique. Br J Surg 78 155–159 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C1MfmvF0%3D Occurrence Handle1826623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. G Navarr E Pozza S Occhionorelli P Cakotoro I Domini (1997) ArticleTitleOne wound laparoscopic cholecysectomy. Br J Surg 84 695 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02586.x Occurrence Handle9171771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WT Ng (1998) ArticleTitleThree trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cautionary note. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 159–160 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199804000-00018 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3is1ahtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9566575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DO Olsen (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161 339–344 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2MfgvVY%3D Occurrence Handle1825754

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. T Otani T Kaji T Fukasawa T Osawa F Seki et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA flower-shaped cannula for three incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12 179–180 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900625 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ktVeltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9479739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. K Slim D Pezet J Stencl Jr C Lechner SL Roux et al. (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three trocar technique. World J Surg 19 394–397 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA28nitVA%3D Occurrence Handle7638995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Trichak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trichak, S. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Surg Endosc 17, 1434–1436 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8713-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8713-1

Keywords

Navigation