Abstract
Background
This experimental, randomized, controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) on colocolic anastomoses. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address this important issue.
Methods
For this study, 50 Wistar albino rats were randomized into five groups. The animals in all the groups underwent laparotomy and colocolic anastomosis. The rats in the control group were not subjected to increased IAP. Accordingly, IAP’s of 14, 20, 25, and 30 mmHg were established by carbon dioxide insufflation and maintained for 60 min in study groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Colocolic anastomosis was realized after these periods of IAP in the study group. Half of the surviving rats in all the groups were sacrificed on postoperative days 7 and 14 to allow comparison between the control and study groups with respect to their mean body weights, mean anastomosis bursting pressures, and histopathologic characteristics of their anastomosis sites.
Results
The mean body weights of all the groups were comparable at all times during the study. The anastomosis bursting pressures of the animals subjected to increased IAP were lower than that of the control group, with the differences reaching statistical relevance for the animals subjected to an IAP of 20 mmHg or higher on postoperative day 7 (p<0.0005 for study groups 2, 3, and 4 vs the control group). The anastomosis bursting pressure showed an inverse correlation with IAP. The adequacy of mucosal layer formation at the anastomosis line was lower and the degree of inflammation was higher in the groups exposed to an IAP of 20 mmHg or higher in the control group (p<0.05 for both comparison among study groups 2, 3, and 4 vs the control group).
Conclusions
An IAP increased to 20 mmHg and higher was found to result in impaired strength and wound healing in colocolic anastomoses, as reflected by the decreased bursting pressure and mucosal layer formation, and by the increased inflammation at the anastomosis sites of animals subjected to high IAP values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arikan AY, Günal Ö, Pehlivan M, Alper M (2000) The effects of intraperitoneal paclitaxel administration on colonic anastomosis. Hepatogastroenterology 47: 1273–1276
Caldwell CB, Ricotta JJ (1987) Changes in visceral blood flow with elevated intraabdominal pressure. J Surg Res 43: 14–20
Cullen DJ, Coyle JP, Teplick R, Long MC (1989) Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intraabdominal pressure in critically ill patients. Crit Care 17: 118–121
Diebel LN, Wilson RF (1992) Effect of increased mesenteric arterial and intestinal mucosal blood flow. J Trauma 33: 45–48
Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Dulchavsky SA, Saxe J (1992) Effect of increased intraabdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow. J Trauma 33: 279–282
Eddy V, Nunn C, Morris JA (1997) Abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am 7: 801–813
Eleftheriadis E, Kotzampassi K, Papanotas K, Heliadis N, Sarris K (1996) Gut ischemia, oxidative stress, and bacterial translocation in elevated abdominal pressure in rats. World J Surg 20: 11–16
Fevang J, Ovrebo K, Ostgaard G, Aakvaag A, Svanes K (1998) Release of endothelin-1 in strangulation obstruction of the small bowel in pigs. J Surg Res 79: 77–84
Fisher EJ (1997) Metabolism in surgical patients. In: Sabiston DC (ed) The biological basis of modern surgical practice. 15th ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 135–145
Gudmundsson FF, Gislason GH, Dicko A, Horn A, Viste A, Grong K, Svanes K (2001) Effects of prolonged increased intraabdominal pressure on gastrointestinal blood flow in pigs. Surg Endosc 15: 854–860
Hauet T, Mothes D, Goujon MJ, Caritez JC, Carratier M, Moyec LL, Eugene M, Tillement JP (1997) Trimetazidine prevent renal injury in the isolated perfused pig kidney exposed to prolonged cold ischemia. Transplantation 64: 1082–1086
Ivatury RR, Diebel L, Porter JM, Simon RJ (1997) Intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am 77: 783–800
Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carrol BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D (1992). Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216: 703–707
Rasmussen IB, Berggren U, Arvidsson D, Ljungdahl M, Haglund U (1995). Effects of pneumoperitoneum on splanchnic hemodynamics: an experimental study in pigs. Eur J Surg 161: 819–826
Safran DB, Orlando R (1994) Physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 167: 281–286
Selkurt E, Johnson P (1958) Effect of acute elevation of portal venous pressure on mesenteric blood volume, intestinal fluid volume, and hemodynamics. Circ Res 6: 592
Tomita H, Marcello PW, Milson JW (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. World J Surg 23: 397–405
Windsor MA, Banham MJ, Rumball M (1997) Splanchnic mucosal ischemia: an unrecognized consequence of routine pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 480–482
Wu JS, Fleshman JW (1997) Colorectal surgery In: Jones DB, Wu JS, Soper NJ (eds) Laparoscopic surgery: principles and procedures. Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, pp 258–287
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Online publication: 7 May 2002
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polat, C., Arikan, Y., Vatansev, C. et al. The effects of increased intraabdominal pressure on colonic anastomoses. Surg Endosc 16, 1314–1319 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9193-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9193-4