Practice distribution in procedural skills training

A randomized controlled trial
  • S. Mackay
  • P. Morgan
  • V. Datta
  • A. Chang
  • A. Darzi
Original Articles

Abstract

Background

“Massed” and “distributed” practice are important concepts in the acquisition of fine motor skills, and may be important in training in procedural skills.

Methods

A total of 41 novice subjects were recruited and randomized to three groups to receive training on the MIST VR surgical trainer. There were 14 subjects in each of groups A and B and 13 subjects in group C. Training comprised 20 min of massed practice for group A, 20 min of distributed practice in 5 min blocks for group B, and 15 min of distributed practice in 5-min blocks for group C. Following the training period, all groups had a 5-min rest period, followed by a 5-min retention test. Comparisons were made between groups A and B, and groups A and C.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between groups A and B (p= 0.023) on the retention test, with group B performing better. The increment between the groups was 19% for the overall score on MIST VR. There were also significant differences in the time taken to complete the task during the training phase (p=0.023, training blocks 3 and 4). Graphical representation suggests no effect between groups A and C, and statistical analysis confirms that the observed difference in median score is not significant.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a benefit for distributed practice over massed practice in learning laparoscopic surgical skills on the MIST VR surgical trainer. This finding has potential implications for skills training in all areas of medicine.

Key words

Practice distribution Massed practice Distributed practice Skills training MIST VR Fine motor skills 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams JA (1987) Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101: 41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohan M, Pharmer JA, Stokes AF (1999) When does imaginary practice enhance performance on a motor task? Percept Mot Skills 88: 651–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bourne LE, and Archer EJ (1956) Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. J Exp Psychol 51: 25–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill: needs to become more objective [Editorial]. Br Med J 318: 887–888Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deliss L, Hudson I (1998) A new surgical timetable. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80: 17–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donovan JJ, Radosevich D J (1999) A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don’t. J Appl Psychol 84: 795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunter S, McLaren P (1993) Specialist medical training and the Calman report. Br Med J 306: 1281–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelty C, Duffy J, Cooper G (1999) Out-of-hours work in cardiothoracic surgery: implications of the new deal and Calman for training. Postgrad Med J 75: 351–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimble G (1949) An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition. J Exp Psychol 39: 15–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee TD, and Genovese ED (1988) Distribution of practice in motor skill aquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Res Q Exercise Sport 59: 277–287Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Mumaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84: 273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Marting J, McCulloch W (1997) Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination. Am J Surg 173: 226–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 33.
    Reznick RK (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165: 358–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosser JC Jr, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1998) Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. Arch Surg 133: 657–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132: 200–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith R (1998) All changed, changed utterly: British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. Br Med J 316: 1917–1918Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sutton C, McCloy R, Middlebrook A, Chater P, Wilson M, Stone R (1997) MIST VR: a laparoscopic surgery procedures trainer and evaluator. Stud Health Technol Inform 39: 598–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A (1998) Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 50: 124–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whitley JD (1970) Effects of practice distribution on learning a fine motor task. Res Q 41: 576–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolfe JH (1998) General surgical training—improvements and problems. Vascular Advisory Committee of the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80: 112–116PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mackay
    • 1
  • P. Morgan
    • 1
  • V. Datta
    • 1
  • A. Chang
    • 1
  • A. Darzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and MedicineSt. Mary’s HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations