Skip to main content
Log in

Selective operative cholangiography and Perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Most common bile duct (CBD) stones can now be removed by minimally invasive methods using pre- or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. A few centers explore the bile duct laparoscopically, but not every hospital has access to the equipment for magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography to diagnose ductal stones. This study shows the results of an alternative management option. Methods: We did a retrospective review of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) and sphincterotomies that were performed on patients in whom choledocholithiasis had been revealed on operative cholangiogram. Results: Thirteen patients underwent perioperative ERCP. Nine had successful duct clearance, three had failure to cannulate, and one was converted to an open procedure due to an anatomical problem. The combined median operating time for both procedures was 75 min and hospital stay was 2.5 days. No pancreatitis was reported. Conclusion: Selective operative cholangiography and perioperative ERCP during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a viable option for the simultaneous management of CBD and gallbladder stones. Moreover, it helps to avoid unnecessary normal ERCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, G., Vellacott, K. Selective operative cholangiography and Perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16, 465–467 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9051-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9051-4

Navigation