Skip to main content
Log in

Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted vs non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Speech recognition technology is a recent development in minimally invasive surgery. This study was designed to assess the impact of HERMES on operating room efficiency and user satisfaction.

Methods

Patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux operations by surgeons experienced in minimally invasive surgery were randomized to HERMES-assisted or standard laparoscopic operations. The variables of interest were circulating nurse’s time spent adjusting devices that are voice-controlled by HERMES, number of adjustments to devices requested, and surgeon and nurse satisfaction measured on a scale from 1 (dissatisfied) to 10 (satisfied).

Results

A total of 30 cases were studied. In the non-HERMES cases, nurses were interrupted to make device adjustments an average of 15.3 times per case versus 0.33 times per case in the with-HERMES cases (p<0.01). The interruptions during the non-HERMES cases averaged 4.35 min per case versus 0.16 min per case in the with-HERMES cases (p=0.03). Average satisfaction scores for HERMES operations as opposed to non-HERMES operations were 9.2 versus 5.3 for nurses (p<0.01) and 9.0 versus 5.1 for surgeons (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Physician and nurse acceptance of HERMES was very high because of the smoother interruption-free environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, Cadeddu JA, Lee BR, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12: 1415–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Damiano RJ, Ehrman WJ, Ducko CT, Tabaie HA, Stephenson ER, Kingsley CP, Chambers CE (2000) Initial United States trial of robotically assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119: 77–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luketich JD, Raja S, Fernando HC, Campbell W, Christie NA, Buenaventura PO, Keenan RJ, Schauer P (2000) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 232: 4: 608–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, Weigel TL, Raja S, Fernando HC, Keenan RJ, Nguyen NT (2000) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000: 70: 906–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 14 June 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luketich, J.D., Fernando, H.C., Buenaventura, P.O. et al. Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted vs non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 16, 1264–1266 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8222-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-8222-7

Key words

Navigation