Skip to main content
Log in

The Quantification of Radiation Fibrosis Using Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, no objective method exists to measure the extent of fibrosis in swallowing musculature in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. We developed and psychometrically tested a method of quantifying fibrosis volume using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The overall aim of this study was to determine if clinical MRI is a reliable tool to measure fibrosis of the pharyngeal musculature in patients with HNC managed with RT and to assess its potential to capture changes in fibrosis over time. Eligible participants were adults with HNC treated with radiation therapy (RT) who received minimally two MRIs and videofluoroscopic swallow (VFS) studies from baseline (pre-RT) up to 1-year post-RT. Two neuroradiologists independently contoured fibrosis volume in batches from MRIs using Vitrea™. Sufficient inter-rater reliability was set at Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) > 0.75. Two speech-language pathologists independently rated VFSs for swallowing impairment using standardized scales, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. MRI and VFS scores were correlated using Spearman’s rank coefficient. Participants included 42 adults (male = 33); mean age 59 (SD = 8.8). ICC (95% Confidence Interval) for fibrosis volume was 0.34 (0, 0.76) for batch one and 0.43 (0, 0.82) for batch two. Consensus meetings were held after each batch. Sufficient reliability was reached by batch three (ICC = 0.95 (0.79, 0.99)). Fibrosis volume increased significantly from 3 to 12 months (mean change = 1.28 mL (SD = 5.21), p = 0.006), as did pharyngeal impairment from baseline to 12 months (mean score change = 3.05 (SD = 3.02), p = 0.003). Fibrosis volume moderately correlated with pharyngeal impairment at 3 and 12 months (0.49, p = 0.004 and 0.59, p = 0.005, respectively). We demonstrated a reliable measure of fibrosis volume in swallowing musculature from existing clinical MRIs and identified that larger fibrosis volume was associated with worse swallowing function. The reliable capture of fibrosis volume offers a pragmatic method for early detection of fibrosis and concomitant dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH. Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:529–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01191-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patterson JM. Late effects of organ preservation treatment on swallowing and voice; presentation, assessment, and screening. Front Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Greco E, Ringash J, Tomlinson G, Huang SH, O’Sullivan B, Waldron J, Martino R. Presence and duration of feeding tube in a 5-year cohort of patients with head and neck cancer treated with curative intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Head Neck. 2021;43:1610–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmignani I, Locatello LG, Desideri I, Bonomo P, Olmetto E, Livi L, Le Saec O, Coscarelli S, Mannelli G. Analysis of dysphagia in advanced-stage head-and-neck cancer patients: impact on quality of life and development of a preventive swallowing treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275:2159–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5054-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutcheson KA. Late radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) in Head and neck cancer survivors. Perspect Swal Swal Dis (Dysph). 2013;22:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd22.2.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Straub JM, New J, Hamilton CD, Lominska C, Shnayder Y, Thomas SM. Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141:1985–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1974-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng J, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Murphy BA. Late soft tissue complications of head and neck cancer therapy: lymphedema and fibrosis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgz005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao X, Kwan JYY, Yip K, Liu PP, Liu FF. Targeting metabolic dysregulation for fibrosis therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0040-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramia P, Bodgi L, Mahmoud D, Mohammad MA, Youssef B, Kopek N, Al-Shamsi H, Dagher M, Abu-Gheida I. Radiation-induced fibrosis in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of pathogenesis and clinical outcomes. Clin Med Insights: Oncol. 2022;16:11795549211036898. https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549211036898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greco E, Simic T, Ringash J, Tomlinson G, Inamoto Y, Martino R. Dysphagia treatment for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy: a meta-analysis review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;101:421–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moloney EC, Brunner M, Alexander AJ, Clark J. Quantifying fibrosis in head and neck cancer treatment: an overview. Head Neck. 2015;37:1225–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw SM, Skoretz SA, O’Sullivan B, Hope A, Liu LW, Martino R. Valid and reliable techniques for measuring fibrosis in patients with head and neck cancer postradiotherapy: a systematic review. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E2322-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vishwanath V, Jafarieh S, Rembielak A. The role of imaging in head and neck cancer: An overview of different imaging modalities in primary diagnosis and staging of the disease. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020;12:512–8. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.100386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, Amdur R. “Pharyngocise”: randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:210–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Messer JA, Mohamed AS, Hutcheson KA, Ding Y, Lewin JS, Wang J, Lai SY, Frank SJ, Garden AS, Sandulache V, Eichelberger H, French CC, Colen RR, Phan J, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Hazle JD, Rosenthal DI, Gunn GB, Fuller CD. Magnetic resonance imaging of swallowing-related structures in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving IMRT: Longitudinal dose-response characterization of quantitative signal kinetics. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118:315–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Meheissen MA, Mohamed AS, Kamal M, Hernandez M, Volpe S, Elhalawani H, Barrow MP, Ding Y, Wang J, Davuluri R, Rostom Y. Cooperative JHaNR-MD. A prospective longitudinal assessment of MRI signal intensity kinetics of non-target muscles in patients with advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer in relationship to radiotherapy dose and post-treatment radiation-associated dysphagia: preliminary findings from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 2019;130:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Oropharynx. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  18. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  19. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Larynx. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  20. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Hypopharynx. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  21. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Carcinoma Unknown Primary. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  22. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Clinical Practice Guidelines Head and Neck Nasopharynx. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. 2019. Available online: https://www.uhn.ca/PrincessMargaret/Health_Professionals/Programs_Departments/Head_Neck/ (accessed on September 29, 2022).

  23. Pfister DG, Spencer S, Adkins D, Birkeland AC, Brizel DM, Busse P, Caudell JJ, Cmelak A, Colevas AD, Durm G, Fakhry C, Galloway T, Geiger JL, Gillison M, Haddad R, Hicks WL, Hitchcock YJ, Jimeno A, Leizman D, Maghami E, Mell LK, Mittal B, Pinto HA, Rocco JW, Rodriguez C, Savvides P, Schwartz D, Shah JP, Sher D, St. John M, Wang H, Weinstein G, Worden F, Bruce JY, Yom SS, Zhen W, Darlow SD, Lyons MJ, McMillian N: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Head and Neck Cancers (Version 1.2023). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2022. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf (accessed on February 5, 2023).

  24. Lewis-Jones H, Colley S, Gibson D. Imaging in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom national multidisciplinary guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:S28-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215116000396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brouwer CL, Steenbakkers RJHM, Bourhis J, Budach W, Grau C, Grégoire V, van Herk M, Lee A, Maingon P, Nutting C, O’Sullivan B, Porceddu SV, Rosenthal DI, Sijtsema NM, Langendijk JA. CT-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG Oncology and TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavigne D, Ng SP, O’Sullivan B, Nguyen-Tan PF, Filion E, Létourneau-Guillon L, Fuller CD, Bahig H. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(11):8302–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Martino R, Fitch MI, Fuller CD, Hope A, Krisciunas G, Langmore SE, Lazarus C, Macdonald CL, McCulloch T, Mills G, Palma DA, Pytynia K, Ringash J, Sultanem K, Theurer J, Thorpe KE, Hutcheson K. The PRO-ACTIVE trial protocol: a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of PROphylACTic swallow InterVEntion for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:1100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08826-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Martino R, Sabry AE, Ringash J, Chen BE, Kartolo A, Greco E, Shaw S, Barker J, Durkin L, Gomes A, Nault C, Siu LL, Waldron J, Warulekar W. Longitudinal changes in swallow and related outcomes of HNC patients treated with systemic therapy and RT: Results of the swallowing substudy of NCIC CTG HN.6. Paper in review.

  29. Wong K, Huang SH, O’Sullivan B, Lockwood G, Dale D, Michaelson T, Waldron J, Bayley A, Cummings B, Dawson LA, Kim J, Liu G, Ringash J. Point-of-care outcome assessment in the cancer clinic: audit of data quality. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:339–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glessgen C, Gallichan D, Moor M, Hainc N, Federau C. Evaluation of 3D fat-navigator based retrospective motion correction in the clinical setting of patients with brain tumors. Neuroradiology. 2019;61:557–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02160-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin-Harris B, Brodsky MB, Michel Y, Castell DO, Schleicher M, Sandidge J, Maxwell R, Blair J. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment—MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008;23:392–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9185-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00417897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu B, Boero IJ, Hwang L, Le QT, Moiseenko V, Sanghvi PR, Cohen EE, Mell LK, Murphy JD. Aspiration pneumonia after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2015;121:1303–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assessment. 1994;6:284–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126.

  36. Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Sonography. 1990;6:35–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ridner SH, Dietrich MS, Niermann K, Cmelak A, Mannion K, Murphy B. A prospective study of the lymphedema and fibrosis continuum in patients with head and neck cancer. Lymphat Res Biol. 2016;14:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2016.0001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Sullivan B, Levin W. Late radiation-related fibrosis: pathogenesis, manifestations, and current management. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13:274–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00037-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schaen-Heacock NE, Jones CA, McCulloch TM. Pharyngeal swallowing pressures in patients with radiation-associated dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2021;36:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10128-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. De Felice F, de Vincentiis M, Luzzi V, Magliulo G, Tombolini M, Ruoppolo G, Polimeni A. Late radiation-associated dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: evidence, research and management. Oral Oncol. 2018;77:125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18:1028–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Dr. Martino’s career award Canada Research Chair in Swallowing Disorders.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZC and RM led the study conceptualization and design, with contributions from EY, WX, NH, JW, and DG. Material preparation was done by ZC, data collection was completed by ZC, AS, NH, and AS, and analyses were performed by ZC, RM, and WX. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZC and all authors provided review and final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary Martino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Che, Z., Suhail, A., Hainc, N. et al. The Quantification of Radiation Fibrosis Using Clinically Indicated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Dysphagia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10678-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-024-10678-2

Keywords

Navigation