Correction to: Effect of the Effortful Swallow on Pharyngeal Cavity Volume: Kinematic Analysis in Three Dimensions Using 320‑Row Area Detector Computed Tomography

Correction to: Dysphagia (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10539-w.

The original version of the article unfortunately contained a mistake in the citation of tables 2 and 3.

It has been corrected in this correction, and original article has been corrected.

• In “Results” section under the heading “Upper Pharyngeal Volume”, in first line after Fig. 3, the Table 2 should be cited.

  During ES, Vmax (ES = 13.2 cm³ (9.4–16.9), control 16.3 cm³ (10.7–20.8),p = 0.008) and Vonset (ES = 12.4 cm³ (7.3–16.8), control 16.2 cm³ (10.7–20.8),p = 0.008) were significantly smaller than control swallows (Fig. 3) (Table 2).

• In “Results” section under the heading “Other Critical Timing Events”, the Table 3 citation should be added at the end of the last sentence.

  These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

• In “Results” section under the heading “Lower Pharyngeal Volume”, at the end of the sentence, the Table 2 citation should be added after Fig.3.

  Vmax (ES = 7.0 cm³ (3.4–9.7), control 6.9cm³ (3.5–8.7), p = 0.612), Vonset (ES = 6.8 cm³ (2.3 -10.9), control 6.9cm³ (3.5–8.7), p = 0.612), and Vmin (ES = 0.03 cm³ (0–0.1), control 0.07cm³ (0–0.3), p = 0.461) were not significantly different between the two swallows (Fig. 3, Table 2).