Skip to main content
Log in

Validation in French of the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire in Patients Referred For Esophageal Manometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire (BEDQ) was recently developed in English to evaluate frequency and intensity of dysphagia. Our aim was to validate this questionnaire in French in a cohort of patients referred for esophageal manometry. Patients referred for esophageal high resolution manometry were offered to fill out different questionnaires including Eckart score, GERDQ score and BEDQ. BEDQ was translated in French by two French native speakers and experts in esophageal motility. Patients were grouped according to the indications of esophageal high resolution manometry (dysphagia, GERD, others). The total BEDQ score was calculated and compared between groups. The validation method used the assessment of internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha and reliability with Guttman split-half reliability. BEDQ questionnaire was completed by 608 patients (44% males, mean age 54 years). The total score had an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90) and reliability (Guttman statistic = 0.92). The correlation was good with Eckardt score (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) but poor with the GERDQ score (r = 0.21, p < 0.01). Patients referred for dysphagia (n = 197) had an Eckardt score and a BEDQ score significantly higher than those referred for GERD or other indications (5.48 vs 3.65 and 3.53 respectively for Eckardt score and 15.85 vs 4.64 and 5.78 for BEDQ, p < 0.001). BEDQ is a valid questionnaire in French to assess dysphagia in clinical practice. It remains to be determined if this score is sensitive to symptom variation and thus useful for the follow up of patients with dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adkins C, Takakura W, Spiegel BMR, Lu M, Vera-Llonch M, Williams J, Almario CV. Prevalence and characteristics of dysphagia based on a population-based survey. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;18(9):1970–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zerbib F, Omari T. Oesophageal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(6):322–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel DA, Sharda R, Hovis KL, Nichols EE, Sathe N, Penson DF, Feurer ID, McPheeters ML, Vaezi MF, Francis DO. Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin E. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:167–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Audag N, Goubau C, Danse E, Vandervelde L, Liistro G, Toussaint M, Reychler G. Validation and reliability of the French version of the Sydney swallow questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2019;34:556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taft TH, Riehl M, Sodikoff JB, Kahrilas PJ, Keefer L, Doerfler B, Pandolfino JE. Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:1854–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckardt VF. Clinical presentations and complications of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North America. 2001;11:281–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, Vakil N, Halling K, Wernersson B, Lind T. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1030–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cisternas D, Taft T, Carlson DA, Glasinovic E, Monrroy H, Rey P, Hani A, Ardila-Hani A, Leguizamo AM, Bilder C, Ditaranto A, Varela A, Agotegaray J, Remes-Troche JM, Ruiz de León A, Pérez de la Serna J, Marin I, Serra J. Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire (BEDQ): results of a multicentric study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;33(4):e14025.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taft TH, Carlson DA, Triggs J, Craft J, Starkey K, Yadlapati R, Gregory D, Pandolfino JE. Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:e13287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cisternas D, Monrroy H, Riquelme A, Padilla O, Fuentes-López E, Valle A, Mejia R, Hani A, Ardila-Hani AF, Leguizamo AM, Bilder C, Ditaranto A, Remes-Troche JM, Ruiz de León A, Pérez de la Serna J, Marin I, Seera J. Fair reliability of eckardt scores in achalasia and non-achalasia patients: psychometric properties of the eckardt spanish version in a multicentric study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32:e13827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SR and TT contributed to the study conception and design. All the authors contributed to material preparation, data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SR, TT and FM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Roman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sabine Roman: research support from Medtronic and Diversatek Healthcare, consultant for Reckitt Benckiser. Dustin A Carlson: consulting and speaking for Medtronic. John E Pandolfino: consulting for Medtronic, Diversatek, Torax, Ironwood, Takeda, and Astra Zeneca; research funding from Impleo; stock options: Crospon. F Mion: potential competing interests with Laborie, MSD, Mayoly Spindler, Schwa Medico, AlfaSigma France. The other authors have nothing to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roman, S., Guadagnoli, L.A., Hastier, A. et al. Validation in French of the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire in Patients Referred For Esophageal Manometry. Dysphagia 37, 392–398 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10290-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10290-8

Keywords

Navigation