Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlation Between EAT-10 and Aspiration Risk Differs by Dysphagia Etiology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agreement between self-reported dysphagic symptoms and actual swallowing physiology can vary widely across individuals. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is a self-report questionnaire commonly used to identify individuals with oropharyngeal dysphagia, but its interpretation for highly prevalent populations is poorly defined. Our primary objective was to determine if correlation strength between EAT-10 and Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores differed by dysphagia etiology. Our secondary objective was to identify clinical factors that were associated with a mismatch between EAT-10 scores and videofluoroscopic findings. Outpatients with Parkinson disease (PD), stroke, and/or head and neck cancer (HNC) who completed EAT-10 and underwent videofluoroscopy were included (n = 203). EAT-10/PAS correlations were calculated by dysphagia etiology. We found that across the sample, higher EAT-10 scores were significantly correlated to higher PAS scores (rs = 0.31, p < 0.001). EAT-10 and PAS were moderately correlated in the HNC group (rs = 0.41, p < 0.001, n = 87), but correlations were modest in the PD (rs = 0.18, n = 41) and stroke groups (rs = 0.12, n = 59). Clinical characteristics of individuals with a “matched” profile (normal EAT-10 score and normal swallow physiology) and a “mismatched” profile (normal EAT-10 score and abnormal swallow physiology) were also compared. Individuals with a “mismatched” EAT-10/PAS profile appeared to be significantly older and had a worse Charlson Comorbidity Index than individuals with a “matched” profile. Within the HNC subgroup, EAT-10/PAS correlations for specific tumor sites, treatment types, and time since treatment are reported. Clinicians may consider these aspiration risk profiles when making recommendations for instrumented swallowing assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Francis DO, Weymuller EA, Parvathaneni U, Merati AL, Yueh B. Dysphagia, stricture, and pneumonia in head and neck cancer patients: does treatment modality matter? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010; 119: 391–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20583737

  3. Wermuth L, Stenager EN, Stenager E, Boldsen J. Mortality in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995;92(1):55–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller N, Allcock L, Hildreth AJ, Jones D, Noble E, Burn DJ. Swallowing problems in Parkinson disease: frequency and clinical correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:1047–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker C, Power M, Hamdy S, Bowen A, Tyrrell P, Thompson DG. Awareness of Dysphagia by patients following stroke predicts swallowing performance. Dysphagia. 2004;19(1):28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogus-Pulia NM, Pierce MC, Mittal BB, Zecker SG, Logemann JA. Changes in swallowing physiology and patient perception of swallowing function following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):223–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Gutierrez-Achury AM, Ruales-Suarez K, Rengifo-Varona ML, Barros C, Posada A, et al. Validation of the Spanish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10spa) in Colombia. A blinded prospective cohort study. Dysphagia. 2016;31:398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, Karaduman AA. Reliability and validity of the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10). Dysphagia. 2016;31(5):644–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, Hazelwood RJ, Martin-Harris B, Velozo C. Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Izaola O, Gómez Hoyos E, López JJ, Ortola A, Torres B, Primo D, et al. The 10-item eating assessment tool is associated with nutritional status, mortality and hospital stay in elderly individuals requiring hospitalization with acute diseases. Nutr Hosp. 2018. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.1698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Popman A, Richter M, Allen J, Wham C. High nutrition risk is associated with higher risk of dysphagia in advanced age adults newly admitted to hospital. Nutr Diet. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wakabayashi H, Matsushima M. Dysphagia assessed by the 10-item eating assessment tool is associated with nutritional status and activities of daily living in elderly individuals requiring long-term care. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2016;20:22–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuo H, Yoshimura Y, Ishizaki N, Ueno T. Dysphagia is associated with functional decline during acute-care hospitalization of older patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(10):1610–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arrese LC, Carrau R, Plowman EK. Relationship between the eating assessment tool-10 and objective clinical ratings of swallowing function in individuals with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2017;32:83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Printza A, Kyrgidis A, Pavlidou E, Triaridis S, Constantinidis J. Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related oropharyngeal dysphagia. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2018;275(7):1861–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Monzani A, Ceriani E, Atac M, Jukic-Peladic N, et al. Reliability and validity of the italian eating assessment tool. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013;122:717–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodrigues B, Nóbrega AC, Sampaio M, Argolo N, Melo A. Silent saliva aspiration in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2011;26:138–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsey D, Smithard D, Kalra L. Silent aspiration: what do we know? Dysphagia. 2005;20:218–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kendall KA, Ellerston J, Heller A, Houtz DR, Zhang C, Presson AP. Objective measures of swallowing function applied to the dysphagia population: a one year experience. Dysphagia. 2016;31(4):538–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheney DM, Tausif Siddiqui M, Litts JK, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. The ability of the 10-item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration risk in persons with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124:351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arslan SS, Demir N, Kilinç HE, Karaduman AA. The ability of the eating assessment Tool-10 to detect aspiration in patients with neurological disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;23(4):550–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zuniga SA, Ebersole B, Jamal N. Utility of Eating Assessment Tool-10 in predicting aspiration in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (United States). 2018;159(1):92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding R, Logemann JA. Patient self-perceptions of swallowing difficulties as compared to expert ratings of videofluorographic studies. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;59:39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi J-C, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, et al. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Speyer R, Kertscher B, Cordier R. Functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res. 2014;3:1043–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cramer D. Fundamental Statistics for Social Research. Fundam Stat Soc Res 2003.

  29. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Second. Lincoln, RI Qual Metric. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Risk factors for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers [Internet]. Centers Dis. Control Prev. 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/oral-cavity-and-oropharyngeal-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html

  33. Mirghani H, Amen F, Moreau F, Lacau St Guily J. Do high-risk human papillomaviruses cause oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma? Oral Oncol. 2015;51(3):229–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Namasivayam-MacDonald AM, Steele CM, Keller HH. Perception versus performance of swallow function in residents of long-term care. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2019;28(3):1198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20:600–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Elisa R. Derickson, BA, for her assistance with the outcomes database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Arizona University, Health Professions, Rm 313, 208 E. Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

    Rebecca S. Bartlett

  2. Northern Arizona University, Health Professions, 208 E. Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

    Mary K. Kenz

  3. Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Bldg 60, Rm #313, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

    Heidi A. Wayment

  4. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA

    Susan L. Thibeault

Authors
  1. Rebecca S. Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary K. Kenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heidi A. Wayment
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susan L. Thibeault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca S. Bartlett.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was completed at Northern Arizona University and University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartlett, R.S., Kenz, M.K., Wayment, H.A. et al. Correlation Between EAT-10 and Aspiration Risk Differs by Dysphagia Etiology. Dysphagia 37, 11–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10244-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10244-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation