Skip to main content

Developmental Changes in Tongue Strength, Swallow Pressures, and Tongue Endurance

Abstract

Maximum tongue strength, mean swallow pressures, and tongue endurance were measured in 324 children ages 6–12 years. The purpose of this study was to measure saliva swallow pressures in absolute terms (i.e., kilopascals) and as a percentage of maximum tongue strength to determine functional reserve in across ages in children and to examine factors that may influence tongue strength and swallow pressures including age, tongue endurance, and tongue-tie. The study results showed that maximum tongue strength and swallow pressures increased with age, while tongue endurance did not. Swallow pressures averaged 44% of maximum tongue strength across ages, indicating that children typically have a functional reserve of 56%. Tongue strength and swallow pressures were not decreased in the 20 children with tongue-tie. A sample clinical case is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Lee JH, et al. The relationship between tongue pressure and oral dysphagia in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(4):620–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshida M, et al. Decreased tongue pressure reflects symptom of dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2006;21(1):61–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Namasivayam-MacDonald AM, et al. How swallow pressures and dysphagia affect malnutrition and mealtime outcomes in long-term care. Dysphagia. 2017;32(6):785–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pitts LL, et al. Lingual pressure dysfunction contributes to reduced swallowing-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(8):2671–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Potter NL, Nievergelt Y, VanDam M. Tongue strength in children with and without speech sound disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(2):612–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McKay R, Smart S, Cocks N. Investigating tongue strength and endurance in children aged 6 to 11 years. Dysphagia. 2019;35(5):762–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanderwegen J, et al. The influence of age, sex, visual feedback, bulb position, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength in healthy belgian children. Dysphagia. 2019;34(6):834–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams V, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). Dysphagia. 2013;28(3):350–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanderwegen J, et al. The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy belgian adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28(2):159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark HM, Solomon NP. Age and sex differences in orofacial strength. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Youmans SR, Stierwalt JA. Measures of tongue function related to normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2006;21(2):102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robbins J, et al. Age effects on lingual pressure generation as a risk factor for dysphagia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(5):M257–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robbins J, et al. The effects of lingual exercise on swallowing in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(9):1483–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stierwalt JA, Youmans SR. Tongue measures in individuals with normal and impaired swallowing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16(2):148–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robbins J, et al. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):150–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McKenna VS, et al. A systematic review of isometric lingual strength-training programs in adults with and without dysphagia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):524–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon NP. Assessment of tongue weakness and fatigue. Int J Orofacial Myol. 2004;30:8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon NP, et al. Assessment of orofacial strength in patients with dysarthria. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;16(4):251–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Potter NL, et al. Facial and lingual strength and endurance in skilled trumpet players. Med Probl Perform Art. 2015;30(2):90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robin D, et al. Impaired tongue strength and endurance in developmental verbal dyspraxia: a physiological analysis. In: Moore C, Yorkston K, Beukelman D, editors., et al., Dysarthria and apraxia of speech: perspectives on management. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company; 1991. p. 173–84.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vaz AC, Bai PM. Lingual frenulum and malocclusion: an overlooked tissue or a minor issue. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(5):488–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricke LA, et al. Newborn tongue-tie: prevalence and effect on breast-feeding. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlock G, et al. Developmental outcomes in Duarte galactosemia. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20182516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Potter NL, Short R. Maximal tongue strength in typically developing children and adolescents. Dysphagia. 2009;24(4):391–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Potter NL, Kent RD, Lazarus JA. Oral and manual force control in preschool-aged children: is there evidence for common control? J Mot Behav. 2009;41(1):66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Potter NL, Nievergelt Y, Shriberg LD. Motor and speech disorders in classic galactosemia. JIMD Rep. 2013;11:31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shriberg LD, Potter NL, Strand EA. Prevalence and phenotype of childhood apraxia of speech in youth with galactosemia. J Speech Language Hear Res. 2011;54(2):487–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ballard JL, Auer CE, Khoury JC. Ankyloglossia: assessment, incidence, and effect of frenuloplasty on the breastfeeding dyad. Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):e63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Amir LH, James JP, Donath SM. Reliability of the hazelbaker assessment tool for lingual frenulum function. Int Breastfeed J. 2006;1(1):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berwig LC, et al. Do gender and age influence hard palate dimensions? A systematic review. Codas. 2018;30(5):e20170216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paus T, et al. Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. Science. 1999;283(5409):1908–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Praagh E, Doré E. Short-term muscle power during growth and maturation. Sports Med. 2002;32(11):701–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vorperian HK, et al. Developmental sexual dimorphism of the oral and pharyngeal portions of the vocal tract: an imaging study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(4):995–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vorperian HK, et al. Development of vocal tract length during early childhood: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117(1):338–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Youmans SR, Youmans GL, Stierwalt JA. Differences in tongue strength across age and gender: is there a diminished strength reserve? Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanders I, et al. The human tongue slows down to speak: muscle fibers of the human tongue. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013;296(10):1615–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Walsh J, et al. Ankyloglossia and lingual frenotomy: national trends in inpatient diagnosis and management in the United States, 1997–2012. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(4):735–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Segal LM, et al. Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of ankyloglossia: methodologic review. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(6):1027–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. McHorney CA, et al. Clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcome tools with respect to bolus flow measures. Dysphagia. 2006;21(3):141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the families who participated in this study, our collaborators at Emory University, Judith Fridovich-Keil, Grace Carlock, Mary Ellen Lynch, Shannan Edwards, Katherine Barrett, research assistants at Washington State University, Cassandra Campbell, Sarah Vest, Mackenzie Wilson Timmins, and Sarita Thotakat and lastly, Catriona Steele for proactively asking us to collect this data.

Funding

Collection of the dataset used for this study was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Award CER-1408–19941 (PI: JL Fridovich-Keil). The statements in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy L. Potter.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Potter, N.L., Bajwa, A., Wilson, E.H. et al. Developmental Changes in Tongue Strength, Swallow Pressures, and Tongue Endurance. Dysphagia 36, 854–863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10200-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10200-4

Keywords

  • Tongue strength
  • Swallow pressure
  • Tongue endurance
  • Pediatric
  • Children
  • Tongue-tie
  • Ankyloglossia