Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 November 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is generally used to diagnose dysphagia and oropharyngeal aspiration during swallowing movement. Patients and bolus-feeding operators (such as occupational therapist and speech language pathologist) may undergo multiple VFSS procedure, placing them at risk for more radiation exposure due to increased scan time. The present study investigated the dose–area product, effective dose of various protocols, and summarized dose reports from various studies of VFSS. The PubMed database searched for relevant publications reporting radiation dose in the VFSS procedure. 13 articles were selected to be reviewed. This systematic review involved 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported the specific dose of the VFSS procedure. The articles were categorized into three types: operator radiation dose, adult patient radiation dose, and pediatric radiation dose. The operator dose reports showed that the operators’ scattering exposure, equivalent dose (across the whole body, eyes, and hands), and annual effective dose were significantly lower than the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Both adult and pediatric patient dose reports showed that the effective dose, which was estimated from recorded dose–area product, was significantly lower than the annual background exposure of 2.4 mSv in various protocols. The present literature review suggested that the radiation dose of VFSS by modified barium swallowing is acceptable in both operators and patients. However, various radiation protection strategies should be conducted during the procedure to reduce the risk of stochastic effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 05 November 2020

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Fig. 1 was incorrect. The correct version of Fig. 1 is given below.

References

  1. Logemann JA. The evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;6:395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Han TR, Paik NJ, Park JW. Quantifying swallowing function after stroke: a functional dysphagia scale based on videofluoroscopic studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:677–82. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.21939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin-Harris B, Jones B. The videofluorographic swallowing study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:769–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2008.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dainiak N. Radiation dose and stochastic risk from exposure to medical imaging. Chest. 2013;144:1431–3. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan CB, Chan LK, Lam HS. Scattered radiation level during videofluoroscopy for swallowing study. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:614–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2001.0904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morishima Y, Chida K, Watanabe H. Estimation of the dose of radiation received by patient and physician during a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia. 2016;31:574–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9718-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawley MT, Savage P, Oakley F. Patient and operator dose during fluoroscopic examination of swallow mechanism. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:654–6. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22832251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes A, Alspaugh JM, Bartelt D, Campion MB, Eng J, Gayler BW, Henkel SE, Jones B, Lingaraj A, Mahesh M, Rostkowski M, Smith CP, Haynos J. Radiation safety for the speech-language pathologist. Dysphagia. 2009;24:274–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9201-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weir KA, McMahon SM, Long G, Bunch JA, Pandeya N, Coakley KS, Chang AB. Radiation doses to children during modified barium swallow studies. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:283–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0397-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hersh C, Wentland C, Sally S, de Stadler M, Hardy S, Fracchia MS, Liu B, Hantnick C. Radiation exposure from videofluoroscopic swallow studies in children with a type 1 laryngeal cleft and pharyngeal dysphagia: a retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;89:92–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sulieman A, Elhag B, Alkhorayerf M, Babikir E. Estimation of effective dose and radiation risk in pediatric barium studies procedures. Appl Radiat Isot. 2018;138:40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zammit-Maempel CCL, Leslie P. Radiation dose in videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2007;22:13–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9031-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chau KHT, Kung CMA. Patient dose during videofluoroscopy swallowing studies in a Hong Kong public hospital. Dysphagia. 2009;24:387–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9214-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim HM, Choi KH, Kim TW. Patients’ radiation dose during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies according to underlying characteristics. Dysphagia. 2013;28:153–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9424-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ko EJ, Sung IY, Choi KH, Kwon YG, Yoon J, Kim T. Radiation exposure during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies in young children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;121:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Im HW, Kim SY, Oh BM, Han TR, Seo HG. Radiation Dose During Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies and Associated Factors in Pediatric Patients. Dysphagia. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10006-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC, Wall BF. Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:819–30. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.898.750819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McLean D, Malitz N, Lewis S. Survey of effective dose levels from typical paediatric CT protocols. Australas Radiol. 2003;47:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0004-8461.2003.01141.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chapple CL, Willis S, Frame J. Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peladeau-Pigeon M, Steele CM. Technical aspects of a videofuoroscopic swallowing study. Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2013;37:216–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mercado-Deane M-G, Burton EM, Harlow SA, Glover AS, Deane DA, Guill MF, Hudson V. Swallowing dysfunction in infants less than 1 year of age. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31:423–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470100456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen MD. Can we use pulsed fuoroscopy to decrease the radiation dose during video fluoroscopic feeding studies in children? Clin Radiol. 2009;64:70–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Crad.2008.07.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hiorns MP, Ryan MM. Current practice in paediatric videofluoroscopy. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:911–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0124-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill F, Keane J, Flynn E, Gallagher R, Farrell E, Murphy M. Clinical Variables Influencing Screening Time During Videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2014;29:144.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bibbo G, Balman D, Linke R. Diagnostic reference levels for common paediatric fluoroscopic examinations performed at a dedicated paediatric Australian hospital. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. 2016;60(4):469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulheren RW, Azola A, González-Fernández M. Do ratings of swallowing function differ by videofluoroscopic rate? An exploratory analysis in patients after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(6):1085–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonilha HS, Blair J, Carnes B, Huda W, Humphries K, McGrattan K, Martin-Harris B. Preliminary investigation of the effect of pulse rate on judgments of swallowing impairment and treatment recommendations. Dysphagia. 2013;28(4):528–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Dongseo University, “Dongseo Cluster Project” Research Fund of 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ji-Su Park or Young-Jin Jung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author claims no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, JY., Hwang, NK., Lee, G. et al. Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review. Dysphagia 36, 73–82 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10112-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10112-3

Keywords

Navigation